File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: A comparison of vaccine hesitancy of COVID-19 vaccination in China and the United States

TitleA comparison of vaccine hesitancy of COVID-19 vaccination in China and the United States
Authors
KeywordsCOVID-19
Global health
Health policy
Public health
Vaccine hesitancy
Vaccine preference
Issue Date2021
Citation
Vaccines, 2021, v. 9, n. 6, article no. 649 How to Cite?
AbstractObjectives: To investigate the differences in vaccine hesitancy and preference of the currently available COVID-19 vaccines between two countries, namely, China and the United States (U.S.). Method: A cross-national survey was conducted in both China and the United States, and discrete choice experiments, as well as Likert scales, were utilized to assess vaccine preference and the underlying factors contributing to vaccination acceptance. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to enable a direct comparison between the two countries. Results: A total of 9077 (5375 and 3702 from China and the United States, respectively) respondents completed the survey. After propensity score matching, over 82.0% of respondents from China positively accepted the COVID-19 vaccination, while 72.2% of respondents from the United States positively accepted it. Specifically, only 31.9% of Chinese respondents were recommended by a doctor to have COVID-19 vaccination, while more than half of the U.S. respondents were recommended by a doctor (50.2%), local health board (59.4%), or friends and families (64.8%). The discrete choice experiments revealed that respondents from the United States attached the greatest importance to the efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines (44.41%), followed by the cost of vaccination (29.57%), whereas those from China held a different viewpoint, that the cost of vaccination covered the largest proportion in their tradeoff (30.66%), and efficacy ranked as the second most important attribute (26.34%). Additionally, respondents from China tended to be much more concerned about the adverse effect of vaccination (19.68% vs. 6.12%) and have a lower perceived severity of being infected with COVID-19. Conclusion: Although the overall acceptance and hesitancy of COVID-19 vaccination in both countries are high, underpinned distinctions between these countries were observed. Owing to the differences in COVID-19 incidence rates, cultural backgrounds, and the availability of specific COVID-19 vaccines in the two countries, vaccine rollout strategies should be nation-dependent.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/330338
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Taoran-
dc.contributor.authorHe, Zonglin-
dc.contributor.authorHuang, Jian-
dc.contributor.authorYan, Ni-
dc.contributor.authorChen, Qian-
dc.contributor.authorHuang, Fengqiu-
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Yuejia-
dc.contributor.authorAkinwunmi, Omolola M.-
dc.contributor.authorAkinwunmi, Babatunde O.-
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Casper J.P.-
dc.contributor.authorWu, Yibo-
dc.contributor.authorMing, Wai Kit-
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-05T12:09:44Z-
dc.date.available2023-09-05T12:09:44Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.citationVaccines, 2021, v. 9, n. 6, article no. 649-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/330338-
dc.description.abstractObjectives: To investigate the differences in vaccine hesitancy and preference of the currently available COVID-19 vaccines between two countries, namely, China and the United States (U.S.). Method: A cross-national survey was conducted in both China and the United States, and discrete choice experiments, as well as Likert scales, were utilized to assess vaccine preference and the underlying factors contributing to vaccination acceptance. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to enable a direct comparison between the two countries. Results: A total of 9077 (5375 and 3702 from China and the United States, respectively) respondents completed the survey. After propensity score matching, over 82.0% of respondents from China positively accepted the COVID-19 vaccination, while 72.2% of respondents from the United States positively accepted it. Specifically, only 31.9% of Chinese respondents were recommended by a doctor to have COVID-19 vaccination, while more than half of the U.S. respondents were recommended by a doctor (50.2%), local health board (59.4%), or friends and families (64.8%). The discrete choice experiments revealed that respondents from the United States attached the greatest importance to the efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines (44.41%), followed by the cost of vaccination (29.57%), whereas those from China held a different viewpoint, that the cost of vaccination covered the largest proportion in their tradeoff (30.66%), and efficacy ranked as the second most important attribute (26.34%). Additionally, respondents from China tended to be much more concerned about the adverse effect of vaccination (19.68% vs. 6.12%) and have a lower perceived severity of being infected with COVID-19. Conclusion: Although the overall acceptance and hesitancy of COVID-19 vaccination in both countries are high, underpinned distinctions between these countries were observed. Owing to the differences in COVID-19 incidence rates, cultural backgrounds, and the availability of specific COVID-19 vaccines in the two countries, vaccine rollout strategies should be nation-dependent.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofVaccines-
dc.subjectCOVID-19-
dc.subjectGlobal health-
dc.subjectHealth policy-
dc.subjectPublic health-
dc.subjectVaccine hesitancy-
dc.subjectVaccine preference-
dc.titleA comparison of vaccine hesitancy of COVID-19 vaccination in China and the United States-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/vaccines9060649-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85108607265-
dc.identifier.volume9-
dc.identifier.issue6-
dc.identifier.spagearticle no. 649-
dc.identifier.epagearticle no. 649-
dc.identifier.eissn2076-393X-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000666301600001-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats