File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: COVID-19 infection rate but not severity is associated with availability of greenness in the United States

TitleCOVID-19 infection rate but not severity is associated with availability of greenness in the United States
Authors
KeywordsHealth inequity
NDVI
Non-pharmaceutical interventions
Public health
Issue Date2023
Citation
Landscape and Urban Planning, 2023, v. 233, article no. 104704 How to Cite?
AbstractHuman exposure to greenness is associated with COVID-19 prevalence and severity, but most relevant research has focused on the relationships between greenness and COVID-19 infection rates. In contrast, relatively little is known about the associations between greenness and COVID-19 hospitalizations and deaths, which are important for risk assessment, resource allocation, and intervention strategies. Moreover, it is unclear whether greenness could help reduce health inequities by offering more benefits to disadvantaged populations. Here, we estimated the associations between availability of greenness (expressed as population-density-weighted normalized difference vegetation index) and COVID-19 outcomes across the urban–rural continuum gradient in the United States using generalized additive models with a negative binomial distribution. We aggregated individual COVID-19 records at the county level, which includes 3,040 counties for COVID-19 case infection rates, 1,397 counties for case hospitalization rates, and 1,305 counties for case fatality rates. Our area-level ecological study suggests that although availability of greenness shows null relationships with COVID-19 case hospitalization and fatality rates, COVID-19 infection rate is statistically significant and negatively associated with more greenness availability. When performing stratified analyses by different sociodemographic groups, availability of greenness shows stronger negative associations for men than for women, and for adults than for the elderly. This indicates that greenness might have greater health benefits for the former than the latter, and thus has limited effects for ameliorating COVID-19 related inequity. The revealed greenness-COVID-19 links across different space, time and sociodemographic groups provide working hypotheses for the targeted design of nature-based interventions and greening policies to benefit human well-being and reduce health inequity. This has important implications for the post-pandemic recovery and future public health crises.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/329922
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 7.9
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 2.358
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLin, Jian-
dc.contributor.authorHuang, Bo-
dc.contributor.authorKwan, Mei Po-
dc.contributor.authorChen, Min-
dc.contributor.authorWang, Qiang-
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-09T03:36:27Z-
dc.date.available2023-08-09T03:36:27Z-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.identifier.citationLandscape and Urban Planning, 2023, v. 233, article no. 104704-
dc.identifier.issn0169-2046-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/329922-
dc.description.abstractHuman exposure to greenness is associated with COVID-19 prevalence and severity, but most relevant research has focused on the relationships between greenness and COVID-19 infection rates. In contrast, relatively little is known about the associations between greenness and COVID-19 hospitalizations and deaths, which are important for risk assessment, resource allocation, and intervention strategies. Moreover, it is unclear whether greenness could help reduce health inequities by offering more benefits to disadvantaged populations. Here, we estimated the associations between availability of greenness (expressed as population-density-weighted normalized difference vegetation index) and COVID-19 outcomes across the urban–rural continuum gradient in the United States using generalized additive models with a negative binomial distribution. We aggregated individual COVID-19 records at the county level, which includes 3,040 counties for COVID-19 case infection rates, 1,397 counties for case hospitalization rates, and 1,305 counties for case fatality rates. Our area-level ecological study suggests that although availability of greenness shows null relationships with COVID-19 case hospitalization and fatality rates, COVID-19 infection rate is statistically significant and negatively associated with more greenness availability. When performing stratified analyses by different sociodemographic groups, availability of greenness shows stronger negative associations for men than for women, and for adults than for the elderly. This indicates that greenness might have greater health benefits for the former than the latter, and thus has limited effects for ameliorating COVID-19 related inequity. The revealed greenness-COVID-19 links across different space, time and sociodemographic groups provide working hypotheses for the targeted design of nature-based interventions and greening policies to benefit human well-being and reduce health inequity. This has important implications for the post-pandemic recovery and future public health crises.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofLandscape and Urban Planning-
dc.subjectHealth inequity-
dc.subjectNDVI-
dc.subjectNon-pharmaceutical interventions-
dc.subjectPublic health-
dc.titleCOVID-19 infection rate but not severity is associated with availability of greenness in the United States-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.landurbplan.2023.104704-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85147298806-
dc.identifier.volume233-
dc.identifier.spagearticle no. 104704-
dc.identifier.epagearticle no. 104704-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000927301200001-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats