File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: On the biological foundation of risk preferences

TitleOn the biological foundation of risk preferences
Authors
KeywordsEvolution
Expected utility
Risk preferences
Issue Date2017
Citation
Journal of Economic Theory, 2017, v. 172, p. 410-422 How to Cite?
AbstractThis paper considers a continuous-time biological model in which the growth rate of a population is determined by the risk attitude of its individuals. We consider choices over lotteries which determine the number of offspring and involve both idiosyncratic and aggregate risks. We distinguish between two types of aggregate risk: environmental variations and natural disasters. Environmental variations influence the death and birth rates, while natural disasters result in instantaneous drops in population size. Our main result is a utility representation of the evolutionary optimal behaviour. The utility is additively separable in the two types of aggregate risk. The term involving environmental variations is a von Neumann–Morgenstern utility which induces the same attitude towards both idiosyncratic and aggregate risk. The term involving disasters cannot be interpreted as an expected utility maximization and induces less tolerance towards aggregate risk.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/329496
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 1.4
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 3.218
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRobatto, Roberto-
dc.contributor.authorSzentes, Balázs-
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-09T03:33:12Z-
dc.date.available2023-08-09T03:33:12Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Economic Theory, 2017, v. 172, p. 410-422-
dc.identifier.issn0022-0531-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/329496-
dc.description.abstractThis paper considers a continuous-time biological model in which the growth rate of a population is determined by the risk attitude of its individuals. We consider choices over lotteries which determine the number of offspring and involve both idiosyncratic and aggregate risks. We distinguish between two types of aggregate risk: environmental variations and natural disasters. Environmental variations influence the death and birth rates, while natural disasters result in instantaneous drops in population size. Our main result is a utility representation of the evolutionary optimal behaviour. The utility is additively separable in the two types of aggregate risk. The term involving environmental variations is a von Neumann–Morgenstern utility which induces the same attitude towards both idiosyncratic and aggregate risk. The term involving disasters cannot be interpreted as an expected utility maximization and induces less tolerance towards aggregate risk.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Economic Theory-
dc.subjectEvolution-
dc.subjectExpected utility-
dc.subjectRisk preferences-
dc.titleOn the biological foundation of risk preferences-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jet.2017.10.002-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85042144946-
dc.identifier.volume172-
dc.identifier.spage410-
dc.identifier.epage422-
dc.identifier.eissn1095-7235-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000416194500014-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats