File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.3390/rs9100990
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85032870118
- WOS: WOS:000414650600020
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: A rigorously-weighted spatiotemporal fusion model with uncertainty analysis
Title | A rigorously-weighted spatiotemporal fusion model with uncertainty analysis |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Landsat MODIS Ordinary kriging Prediction uncertainty Rigorously-weighted spatiotemporal fusion |
Issue Date | 2017 |
Citation | Remote Sensing, 2017, v. 9, n. 10, article no. 990 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Interest has been growing with regard to the use of remote sensing data characterized by a fine spatial resolution and frequent coverage for the monitoring of land surface dynamics. However, current satellite sensors are fundamentally limited by a trade-off between their spatial and temporal resolutions. Spatiotemporal fusion thus provides a feasible solution to overcome this limitation, and many blending algorithms have been developed. Among them, the popular spatial and temporal adaptive reflectance fusion model (STARFM) is based on a weighted function; however, it uses an ad hoc approach to estimate the weights of surrounding similar pixels. Additionally, an uncertainty analysis of the predicted result is not provided in the STARFM or any other fusion algorithm. This paper proposes a rigorously-weighted spatiotemporal fusion model (RWSTFM) based on geostatistics to blend the surface reflectances of Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) and Landsat-5 Thematic Mapper (TM) imagery. The RWSTFM, which is based on ordinary kriging, derives the weights in terms of a fitted semivariance-distance relationship and calculates the estimation variance, which is a measure of the prediction uncertainty. The RWSTFM was tested using three datasets and compared with two commonly-used spatiotemporal reflectance fusion algorithms: the STARFM and the flexible spatiotemporal data fusion (FSDAF) method. The fusion results show that the proposed RWSTFM consistently outperformed the other algorithms both visually and quantitatively. Additionally, more than 70% of the squared error was accounted for by the estimation variance of the RWSTFM for all three of the datasets. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/329469 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Wang, Jing | - |
dc.contributor.author | Huang, Bo | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-08-09T03:33:01Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-08-09T03:33:01Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2017 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Remote Sensing, 2017, v. 9, n. 10, article no. 990 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/329469 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Interest has been growing with regard to the use of remote sensing data characterized by a fine spatial resolution and frequent coverage for the monitoring of land surface dynamics. However, current satellite sensors are fundamentally limited by a trade-off between their spatial and temporal resolutions. Spatiotemporal fusion thus provides a feasible solution to overcome this limitation, and many blending algorithms have been developed. Among them, the popular spatial and temporal adaptive reflectance fusion model (STARFM) is based on a weighted function; however, it uses an ad hoc approach to estimate the weights of surrounding similar pixels. Additionally, an uncertainty analysis of the predicted result is not provided in the STARFM or any other fusion algorithm. This paper proposes a rigorously-weighted spatiotemporal fusion model (RWSTFM) based on geostatistics to blend the surface reflectances of Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) and Landsat-5 Thematic Mapper (TM) imagery. The RWSTFM, which is based on ordinary kriging, derives the weights in terms of a fitted semivariance-distance relationship and calculates the estimation variance, which is a measure of the prediction uncertainty. The RWSTFM was tested using three datasets and compared with two commonly-used spatiotemporal reflectance fusion algorithms: the STARFM and the flexible spatiotemporal data fusion (FSDAF) method. The fusion results show that the proposed RWSTFM consistently outperformed the other algorithms both visually and quantitatively. Additionally, more than 70% of the squared error was accounted for by the estimation variance of the RWSTFM for all three of the datasets. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Remote Sensing | - |
dc.subject | Landsat | - |
dc.subject | MODIS | - |
dc.subject | Ordinary kriging | - |
dc.subject | Prediction uncertainty | - |
dc.subject | Rigorously-weighted spatiotemporal fusion | - |
dc.title | A rigorously-weighted spatiotemporal fusion model with uncertainty analysis | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.3390/rs9100990 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85032870118 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 9 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 10 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | article no. 990 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | article no. 990 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 2072-4292 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000414650600020 | - |