File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: A rigorously-weighted spatiotemporal fusion model with uncertainty analysis

TitleA rigorously-weighted spatiotemporal fusion model with uncertainty analysis
Authors
KeywordsLandsat
MODIS
Ordinary kriging
Prediction uncertainty
Rigorously-weighted spatiotemporal fusion
Issue Date2017
Citation
Remote Sensing, 2017, v. 9, n. 10, article no. 990 How to Cite?
AbstractInterest has been growing with regard to the use of remote sensing data characterized by a fine spatial resolution and frequent coverage for the monitoring of land surface dynamics. However, current satellite sensors are fundamentally limited by a trade-off between their spatial and temporal resolutions. Spatiotemporal fusion thus provides a feasible solution to overcome this limitation, and many blending algorithms have been developed. Among them, the popular spatial and temporal adaptive reflectance fusion model (STARFM) is based on a weighted function; however, it uses an ad hoc approach to estimate the weights of surrounding similar pixels. Additionally, an uncertainty analysis of the predicted result is not provided in the STARFM or any other fusion algorithm. This paper proposes a rigorously-weighted spatiotemporal fusion model (RWSTFM) based on geostatistics to blend the surface reflectances of Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) and Landsat-5 Thematic Mapper (TM) imagery. The RWSTFM, which is based on ordinary kriging, derives the weights in terms of a fitted semivariance-distance relationship and calculates the estimation variance, which is a measure of the prediction uncertainty. The RWSTFM was tested using three datasets and compared with two commonly-used spatiotemporal reflectance fusion algorithms: the STARFM and the flexible spatiotemporal data fusion (FSDAF) method. The fusion results show that the proposed RWSTFM consistently outperformed the other algorithms both visually and quantitatively. Additionally, more than 70% of the squared error was accounted for by the estimation variance of the RWSTFM for all three of the datasets.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/329469
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWang, Jing-
dc.contributor.authorHuang, Bo-
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-09T03:33:01Z-
dc.date.available2023-08-09T03:33:01Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.citationRemote Sensing, 2017, v. 9, n. 10, article no. 990-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/329469-
dc.description.abstractInterest has been growing with regard to the use of remote sensing data characterized by a fine spatial resolution and frequent coverage for the monitoring of land surface dynamics. However, current satellite sensors are fundamentally limited by a trade-off between their spatial and temporal resolutions. Spatiotemporal fusion thus provides a feasible solution to overcome this limitation, and many blending algorithms have been developed. Among them, the popular spatial and temporal adaptive reflectance fusion model (STARFM) is based on a weighted function; however, it uses an ad hoc approach to estimate the weights of surrounding similar pixels. Additionally, an uncertainty analysis of the predicted result is not provided in the STARFM or any other fusion algorithm. This paper proposes a rigorously-weighted spatiotemporal fusion model (RWSTFM) based on geostatistics to blend the surface reflectances of Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) and Landsat-5 Thematic Mapper (TM) imagery. The RWSTFM, which is based on ordinary kriging, derives the weights in terms of a fitted semivariance-distance relationship and calculates the estimation variance, which is a measure of the prediction uncertainty. The RWSTFM was tested using three datasets and compared with two commonly-used spatiotemporal reflectance fusion algorithms: the STARFM and the flexible spatiotemporal data fusion (FSDAF) method. The fusion results show that the proposed RWSTFM consistently outperformed the other algorithms both visually and quantitatively. Additionally, more than 70% of the squared error was accounted for by the estimation variance of the RWSTFM for all three of the datasets.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofRemote Sensing-
dc.subjectLandsat-
dc.subjectMODIS-
dc.subjectOrdinary kriging-
dc.subjectPrediction uncertainty-
dc.subjectRigorously-weighted spatiotemporal fusion-
dc.titleA rigorously-weighted spatiotemporal fusion model with uncertainty analysis-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/rs9100990-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85032870118-
dc.identifier.volume9-
dc.identifier.issue10-
dc.identifier.spagearticle no. 990-
dc.identifier.epagearticle no. 990-
dc.identifier.eissn2072-4292-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000414650600020-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats