File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: What factors influence uk medical students’ choice of foundation school?

TitleWhat factors influence uk medical students’ choice of foundation school?
Authors
KeywordsFoundation school
Location of training
Social relationships
UK postgraduate training
Issue Date2017
Citation
Advances in Medical Education and Practice, 2017, v. 8, p. 293-297 How to Cite?
AbstractBackground: We aimed to identify the factors influencing UK medical student applicants’ choice of foundation school. We also explored the factors that doctors currently approaching the end of their 2-year program believe should be considered. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted during the 2013–2014 academic year. An online questionnaire was distributed to 2092 final-year medical students from nine UK medical schools and 84 foundation year-2 (FY2) doctors from eight foundation schools. Participants were asked to rank their top 3 from a list of 12 factors that could potentially influence choice of foundation school on a 5-point Likert scale. Collated categorical data from the two groups were compared using a chi-square test with Yates correction. Results: Geographic location was overwhelmingly the most important factor for medical students and FY2 doctors with 97.2% and 98.8% in agreement, respectively. Social relationships played a pivotal role for medical student applicants. Clinical specialties within the rotations were of less importance to medical students, in comparison to location and social relationships. In contrast, FY2 doctors placed a significantly greater importance on the specialties undertaken in their 2-year training program, when compared to medical students (chi-square; p=0.0001). Conclusion: UK medical schools should make their foundation program applicants aware of the importance of choosing rotations based on specialties that will be undertaken. Individual foundation schools could provide a more favorable linked application system and greater choice and flexibility of specialties within their 2-year program, potentially making their institution more attractive to future applicants.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/328795
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMiah, Saiful-
dc.contributor.authorPang, Karl H.-
dc.contributor.authorRebello, Wayne-
dc.contributor.authorRubakumar, Zoe-
dc.contributor.authorFung, Victoria-
dc.contributor.authorVenugopal, Suresh-
dc.contributor.authorBegum, Hena-
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-22T06:24:06Z-
dc.date.available2023-07-22T06:24:06Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.citationAdvances in Medical Education and Practice, 2017, v. 8, p. 293-297-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/328795-
dc.description.abstractBackground: We aimed to identify the factors influencing UK medical student applicants’ choice of foundation school. We also explored the factors that doctors currently approaching the end of their 2-year program believe should be considered. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted during the 2013–2014 academic year. An online questionnaire was distributed to 2092 final-year medical students from nine UK medical schools and 84 foundation year-2 (FY2) doctors from eight foundation schools. Participants were asked to rank their top 3 from a list of 12 factors that could potentially influence choice of foundation school on a 5-point Likert scale. Collated categorical data from the two groups were compared using a chi-square test with Yates correction. Results: Geographic location was overwhelmingly the most important factor for medical students and FY2 doctors with 97.2% and 98.8% in agreement, respectively. Social relationships played a pivotal role for medical student applicants. Clinical specialties within the rotations were of less importance to medical students, in comparison to location and social relationships. In contrast, FY2 doctors placed a significantly greater importance on the specialties undertaken in their 2-year training program, when compared to medical students (chi-square; p=0.0001). Conclusion: UK medical schools should make their foundation program applicants aware of the importance of choosing rotations based on specialties that will be undertaken. Individual foundation schools could provide a more favorable linked application system and greater choice and flexibility of specialties within their 2-year program, potentially making their institution more attractive to future applicants.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofAdvances in Medical Education and Practice-
dc.subjectFoundation school-
dc.subjectLocation of training-
dc.subjectSocial relationships-
dc.subjectUK postgraduate training-
dc.titleWhat factors influence uk medical students’ choice of foundation school?-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.2147/AMEP.S134081-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85097572239-
dc.identifier.volume8-
dc.identifier.spage293-
dc.identifier.epage297-
dc.identifier.eissn1179-7258-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000399801800001-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats