File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Energy Saving May Kill: Evidence from the Fukushima Nuclear Accident

TitleEnergy Saving May Kill: Evidence from the Fukushima Nuclear Accident
Authors
Issue Date1-Apr-2023
PublisherAmerican Economic Association
Citation
American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 2023, v. 15, n. 2, p. 377-414 How to Cite?
Abstract

Following the Fukushima nuclear accident, Japan gradually shut down all its nuclear power plants, causing a countrywide power shortage. In response the government launched large-scale energy-saving campaigns to reduce electricity consumption. Exploiting the electricity-saving targets across regions and over time, we show that the campaigns significantly increased mortality, particularly during extremely hot days. The impact is primarily driven by people using less air conditioning, as encouraged by the government. Nonpecuniary incentives can explain most of the reduction in electricity consumption. Our findings suggest there exists a trade-off between climate change mitigation and climate change adaptation.


Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/328358
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 5.5
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 8.933
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHe, GJ-
dc.contributor.authorTanaka, T-
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-28T04:43:09Z-
dc.date.available2023-06-28T04:43:09Z-
dc.date.issued2023-04-01-
dc.identifier.citationAmerican Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 2023, v. 15, n. 2, p. 377-414-
dc.identifier.issn1945-7782-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/328358-
dc.description.abstract<p>Following the Fukushima nuclear accident, Japan gradually shut down all its nuclear power plants, causing a countrywide power shortage. In response the government launched large-scale energy-saving campaigns to reduce electricity consumption. Exploiting the electricity-saving targets across regions and over time, we show that the campaigns significantly increased mortality, particularly during extremely hot days. The impact is primarily driven by people using less air conditioning, as encouraged by the government. Nonpecuniary incentives can explain most of the reduction in electricity consumption. Our findings suggest there exists a trade-off between climate change mitigation and climate change adaptation.<br></p>-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherAmerican Economic Association-
dc.relation.ispartofAmerican Economic Journal: Applied Economics-
dc.titleEnergy Saving May Kill: Evidence from the Fukushima Nuclear Accident-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1257/app.20200505-
dc.identifier.hkuros344682-
dc.identifier.volume15-
dc.identifier.issue2-
dc.identifier.spage377-
dc.identifier.epage414-
dc.identifier.eissn1945-7790-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000971949200013-
dc.identifier.issnl1945-7790-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats