File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1177/1468017318814761
- WOS: WOS:000528238300005
- Find via
Supplementary
-
Citations:
- Web of Science: 0
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Will material interest make social workers quit their job? A meta-analysis
Title | Will material interest make social workers quit their job? A meta-analysis |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Labor market Markets Modern society Professionalism Professionalization Professions Research applications Social work Social workers |
Issue Date | 2020 |
Publisher | SAGE Publications. |
Citation | Journal of social work : JSW, 2020, v. 20, n. 3, p. 340-364 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Summary The academia and the profession have long overlooked the importance of material interest in the profession of social work. In order to address this research gap, we first reviewed the historical role that material interest has played in differentiating professions from nonprofessions and analyzed its decreasing status along the development of professions due to the two competing discourses of professionalization and de-professionalization. We concluded with the fundamental question, “does material interest still matter for the professions under the current professional environments,” and answered this question by purposively selecting one of the most important organizational outcomes of the social work workplace—turnover intentions—as our dependent variable. We then conducted a meta-analysis to investigate the relationship between salary and turnover on 24 studies with a combined sample of 9343 social workers. Findings The results showed that salary was negatively related to social workers’ intentions to leave organizations (r = −.18, ρ = −.21). Specifically, both social workers’ actual salary and their satisfaction with pay and benefits were negatively associated with individual employees’ turnover intentions. Applications This research also supported Barth’s argument that despite social workers’ earnings are “unresponsive” to the labor market, they are not so different from other professions in the workforce market. Research implications both for the third model of the profession—institutionalist professionalism—in contemporary society and for salary raises were discussed. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/328042 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 1.5 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.601 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Luo, MS | - |
dc.contributor.author | Chui, EWT | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-06-05T08:22:56Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-06-05T08:22:56Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Journal of social work : JSW, 2020, v. 20, n. 3, p. 340-364 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1468-0173 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/328042 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Summary The academia and the profession have long overlooked the importance of material interest in the profession of social work. In order to address this research gap, we first reviewed the historical role that material interest has played in differentiating professions from nonprofessions and analyzed its decreasing status along the development of professions due to the two competing discourses of professionalization and de-professionalization. We concluded with the fundamental question, “does material interest still matter for the professions under the current professional environments,” and answered this question by purposively selecting one of the most important organizational outcomes of the social work workplace—turnover intentions—as our dependent variable. We then conducted a meta-analysis to investigate the relationship between salary and turnover on 24 studies with a combined sample of 9343 social workers. Findings The results showed that salary was negatively related to social workers’ intentions to leave organizations (r = −.18, ρ = −.21). Specifically, both social workers’ actual salary and their satisfaction with pay and benefits were negatively associated with individual employees’ turnover intentions. Applications This research also supported Barth’s argument that despite social workers’ earnings are “unresponsive” to the labor market, they are not so different from other professions in the workforce market. Research implications both for the third model of the profession—institutionalist professionalism—in contemporary society and for salary raises were discussed. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.publisher | SAGE Publications. | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of social work : JSW | - |
dc.subject | Labor market | - |
dc.subject | Markets | - |
dc.subject | Modern society | - |
dc.subject | Professionalism | - |
dc.subject | Professionalization | - |
dc.subject | Professions | - |
dc.subject | Research applications | - |
dc.subject | Social work | - |
dc.subject | Social workers | - |
dc.title | Will material interest make social workers quit their job? A meta-analysis | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1177/1468017318814761 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 20 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 3 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 340 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 364 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000528238300005 | - |
dc.publisher.place | London, England | - |