File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Present status and future directions: Hydraulic materials for endodontic use

TitlePresent status and future directions: Hydraulic materials for endodontic use
Authors
Keywordsantimicrobial properties
biological properties
clinical studies
extra-radicular
hydraulic calcium silicates
hydraulic cements
intra-coronal
intra-radicular
material characterization
physical characteristics
Issue Date2022
Citation
International Endodontic Journal, 2022, v. 55, n. S3, p. 710-777 How to Cite?
AbstractBackground: Hydraulic materials are used in Endodontics due to their hydration characteristics namely the formation of calcium hydroxide when mixing with water and also because of their hydraulic properties. These materials are presented in various consistencies and delivery methods. They are composed primarily of tricalcium and dicalcium silicate, and also include a radiopacifier, additives and an aqueous or a non-aqueous vehicle. Only materials whose primary reaction is with water can be classified as hydraulic. Objectives: Review of the classification of hydraulic materials by Camilleri and the literature pertaining to specific uses of hydraulic cements in endodontics namely intra-coronal, intra-radicular and extra-radicular. Review of the literature on the material properties linked to specific uses providing the current status of these materials after which future trends and gaps in knowledge could be identified. Methods: The literature was reviewed using PUBMED, and for each clinical use, the in vitro properties such as physical, chemical, biological and antimicrobial characteristics and clinical data were extracted and evaluated. Results: A large number of publications were retrieved for each clinical use and these were grouped depending on the property type being investigated. Conclusions: The hydraulic cements have made a difference in clinical outcomes. The main shortcoming is the poor testing methodologies employed which provide very limited information and also inhibits adequate clinical translation. Furthermore, the clinical protocols need to be updated to enable the materials to be employed effectively.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/327781
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 5.165
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.988

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCamilleri, Josette-
dc.contributor.authorAtmeh, Amre-
dc.contributor.authorLi, Xin-
dc.contributor.authorMeschi, Nastaran-
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-08T02:26:46Z-
dc.date.available2023-05-08T02:26:46Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.citationInternational Endodontic Journal, 2022, v. 55, n. S3, p. 710-777-
dc.identifier.issn0143-2885-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/327781-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Hydraulic materials are used in Endodontics due to their hydration characteristics namely the formation of calcium hydroxide when mixing with water and also because of their hydraulic properties. These materials are presented in various consistencies and delivery methods. They are composed primarily of tricalcium and dicalcium silicate, and also include a radiopacifier, additives and an aqueous or a non-aqueous vehicle. Only materials whose primary reaction is with water can be classified as hydraulic. Objectives: Review of the classification of hydraulic materials by Camilleri and the literature pertaining to specific uses of hydraulic cements in endodontics namely intra-coronal, intra-radicular and extra-radicular. Review of the literature on the material properties linked to specific uses providing the current status of these materials after which future trends and gaps in knowledge could be identified. Methods: The literature was reviewed using PUBMED, and for each clinical use, the in vitro properties such as physical, chemical, biological and antimicrobial characteristics and clinical data were extracted and evaluated. Results: A large number of publications were retrieved for each clinical use and these were grouped depending on the property type being investigated. Conclusions: The hydraulic cements have made a difference in clinical outcomes. The main shortcoming is the poor testing methodologies employed which provide very limited information and also inhibits adequate clinical translation. Furthermore, the clinical protocols need to be updated to enable the materials to be employed effectively.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Endodontic Journal-
dc.subjectantimicrobial properties-
dc.subjectbiological properties-
dc.subjectclinical studies-
dc.subjectextra-radicular-
dc.subjecthydraulic calcium silicates-
dc.subjecthydraulic cements-
dc.subjectintra-coronal-
dc.subjectintra-radicular-
dc.subjectmaterial characterization-
dc.subjectphysical characteristics-
dc.titlePresent status and future directions: Hydraulic materials for endodontic use-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/iej.13709-
dc.identifier.pmid35167119-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85126363184-
dc.identifier.volume55-
dc.identifier.issueS3-
dc.identifier.spage710-
dc.identifier.epage777-
dc.identifier.eissn1365-2591-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats