File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1056/NEJMoa1910549
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85080089288
- PMID: 32101663
- WOS: WOS:000518581500007
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Pembrolizumab for early triple-negative breast cancer
Title | Pembrolizumab for early triple-negative breast cancer |
---|---|
Authors | |
Issue Date | 2020 |
Citation | New England Journal of Medicine, 2020, v. 382, n. 9, p. 810-821 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Background: Previous trials showed promising antitumor activity and an acceptable safety profile associated with pembrolizumab in patients with early triple-negative breast cancer. Whether the addition of pembrolizumab to neoadjuvant chemotherapy would significantly increase the percentage of patients with early triple-negative breast cancer who have a pathological complete response (defined as no invasive cancer in the breast and negative nodes) at definitive surgery is unclear. Methods: In this phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned (in a 2:1 ratio) patients with previously untreated stage II or stage III triple-negative breast cancer to receive neoadjuvant therapy with four cycles of pembrolizumab (at a dose of 200 mg) every 3 weeks plus paclitaxel and carboplatin (784 patients; the pembrolizumab-chemotherapy group) or placebo every 3 weeks plus paclitaxel and carboplatin (390 patients; the placebo-chemotherapy group); the two groups then received an additional four cycles of pembrolizumab or placebo, and both groups received doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide or epirubicin-cyclophosphamide. After definitive surgery, the patients received adjuvant pembrolizumab or placebo every 3 weeks for up to nine cycles. The primary end points were a pathological complete response at the time of definitive surgery and event-free survival in the intention-to-treat population. Results: At the first interim analysis, among the first 602 patients who underwent randomization, the percentage of patients with a pathological complete response was 64.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 59.9 to 69.5) in the pembrolizumab-chemotherapy group and 51.2% (95% CI, 44.1 to 58.3) in the placebo-chemotherapy group (estimated treatment difference, 13.6 percentage points; 95% CI, 5.4 to 21.8; P<0.001). After a median follow-up of 15.5 months (range, 2.7 to 25.0), 58 of 784 patients (7.4%) in the pembrolizumab-chemotherapy group and 46 of 390 patients (11.8%) in the placebo-chemotherapy group had disease progression that precluded definitive surgery, had local or distant recurrence or a second primary tumor, or died from any cause (hazard ratio, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.43 to 0.93). Across all treatment phases, the incidence of treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or higher was 78.0% in the pembrolizumab-chemotherapy group and 73.0% in the placebo-chemotherapy group, including death in 0.4% (3 patients) and 0.3% (1 patient), respectively. Conclusions: Among patients with early triple-negative breast cancer, the percentage with a pathological complete response was significantly higher among those who received pembrolizumab plus neoadjuvant chemotherapy than among those who received placebo plus neoadjuvant chemotherapy. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/326494 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 96.2 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 20.544 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Schmid, P. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Cortes, J. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Pusztai, L. | - |
dc.contributor.author | McArthur, H. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kümmel, S. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Bergh, J. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Denkert, C. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Park, Y. H. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Hui, R. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Harbeck, N. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Takahashi, M. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Foukakis, T. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Fasching, P. A. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Cardoso, F. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Untch, M. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Jia, L. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Karantza, V. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Zhao, J. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Aktan, G. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Dent, R. | - |
dc.contributor.author | O'Shaughnessy, J. | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-03-10T02:19:41Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-03-10T02:19:41Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | New England Journal of Medicine, 2020, v. 382, n. 9, p. 810-821 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0028-4793 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/326494 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Background: Previous trials showed promising antitumor activity and an acceptable safety profile associated with pembrolizumab in patients with early triple-negative breast cancer. Whether the addition of pembrolizumab to neoadjuvant chemotherapy would significantly increase the percentage of patients with early triple-negative breast cancer who have a pathological complete response (defined as no invasive cancer in the breast and negative nodes) at definitive surgery is unclear. Methods: In this phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned (in a 2:1 ratio) patients with previously untreated stage II or stage III triple-negative breast cancer to receive neoadjuvant therapy with four cycles of pembrolizumab (at a dose of 200 mg) every 3 weeks plus paclitaxel and carboplatin (784 patients; the pembrolizumab-chemotherapy group) or placebo every 3 weeks plus paclitaxel and carboplatin (390 patients; the placebo-chemotherapy group); the two groups then received an additional four cycles of pembrolizumab or placebo, and both groups received doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide or epirubicin-cyclophosphamide. After definitive surgery, the patients received adjuvant pembrolizumab or placebo every 3 weeks for up to nine cycles. The primary end points were a pathological complete response at the time of definitive surgery and event-free survival in the intention-to-treat population. Results: At the first interim analysis, among the first 602 patients who underwent randomization, the percentage of patients with a pathological complete response was 64.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 59.9 to 69.5) in the pembrolizumab-chemotherapy group and 51.2% (95% CI, 44.1 to 58.3) in the placebo-chemotherapy group (estimated treatment difference, 13.6 percentage points; 95% CI, 5.4 to 21.8; P<0.001). After a median follow-up of 15.5 months (range, 2.7 to 25.0), 58 of 784 patients (7.4%) in the pembrolizumab-chemotherapy group and 46 of 390 patients (11.8%) in the placebo-chemotherapy group had disease progression that precluded definitive surgery, had local or distant recurrence or a second primary tumor, or died from any cause (hazard ratio, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.43 to 0.93). Across all treatment phases, the incidence of treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or higher was 78.0% in the pembrolizumab-chemotherapy group and 73.0% in the placebo-chemotherapy group, including death in 0.4% (3 patients) and 0.3% (1 patient), respectively. Conclusions: Among patients with early triple-negative breast cancer, the percentage with a pathological complete response was significantly higher among those who received pembrolizumab plus neoadjuvant chemotherapy than among those who received placebo plus neoadjuvant chemotherapy. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | New England Journal of Medicine | - |
dc.title | Pembrolizumab for early triple-negative breast cancer | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1056/NEJMoa1910549 | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 32101663 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85080089288 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 382 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 9 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 810 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 821 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1533-4406 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000518581500007 | - |
dc.identifier.f1000 | 737441116 | - |