File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Systematic evaluation of pembrolizumab dosing in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

TitleSystematic evaluation of pembrolizumab dosing in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer
Authors
KeywordsExposure-response
Immunotherapy
Non-small-cell lung cancer
PD-L1
Pembrolizumab
Tumor size modeling
Issue Date2016
Citation
Annals of Oncology, 2016, v. 27, n. 7, p. 1291-1298 How to Cite?
AbstractBackground: In the phase I KEYNOTE-001 study, pembrolizumab demonstrated durable antitumor activity in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We sought to characterize the relationship between pembrolizumab dose, exposure, and response to define an effective dose for these patients. Patients and methods: Patients received pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg every 3 weeks (Q3W) (n = 55), 10 mg/kg Q3W (n = 238), or 10 mg/kg Q2W (n = 156). Response (RECIST v1.1) was assessed every 9 weeks. The relationship between the estimated pembrolizumab area under the concentration-time curve at steady state over 6 weeks (AUCss-6weeks) and the longitudinal change in tumor size (sum of longest diameters) was analyzed by regression and non-linear mixed effects modeling. This model was simultaneously fit to all tumor size data, then used to simulate response rates, normalizing the trial data across dose for prognostic covariates (tumor PD-L1 expression and EGFR mutation status). The exposure- safety relationship was assessed by logistic regression of pembrolizumab AUCss-6weeks versus occurrence of adverse events (AEs) of interest based on their immune etiology. Results: Overall response rates were 15% [95% confidence interval (CI) 7%-28%] at 2 mg/kg Q3W, 25% (18%-33%) at 10 mg/kg Q3W, and 21% (95% CI 14%-30%) at 10 mg/kg Q2W. Regression analyses of percentage change from baseline in tumor size versus AUCss-6weeks indicated a flat relationship (regression slope P > 0.05). Simulations showed the exposure-response relationship to be similarly flat, thus indicating that the lowest evaluated dose of 2 mg/kg Q3W to likely be at or near the efficacy plateau. Exposure-safety analysis showed the AE incidence to be similar among the clinically tested doses. Conclusions: No significant exposure dependency on efficacy or safety was identified for pembrolizumab across doses of 2-10 mg/kg. These results support the use of a 2 mg/kg Q3Wdosage in patients with previously treated, advanced NSCLC. ClinicalTrials.gov registry: NCT01295827.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/326467
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 56.7
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 13.942
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChatterjee, M.-
dc.contributor.authorTurner, D. C.-
dc.contributor.authorFelip, E.-
dc.contributor.authorLena, H.-
dc.contributor.authorCappuzzo, F.-
dc.contributor.authorHorn, L.-
dc.contributor.authorGaron, E. B.-
dc.contributor.authorHui, R.-
dc.contributor.authorArkenau, H. T.-
dc.contributor.authorGubens, M. A.-
dc.contributor.authorHellmann, M. D.-
dc.contributor.authorDong, D.-
dc.contributor.authorLi, C.-
dc.contributor.authorMayawala, K.-
dc.contributor.authorFreshwater, T.-
dc.contributor.authorAhamadi, M.-
dc.contributor.authorStone, J.-
dc.contributor.authorLubiniecki, G. M.-
dc.contributor.authorZhang, J.-
dc.contributor.authorIm, E.-
dc.contributor.authorDe Alwis, D. P.-
dc.contributor.authorKondic, A. G.-
dc.contributor.authorFløtten-
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-10T02:19:29Z-
dc.date.available2023-03-10T02:19:29Z-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.citationAnnals of Oncology, 2016, v. 27, n. 7, p. 1291-1298-
dc.identifier.issn0923-7534-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/326467-
dc.description.abstractBackground: In the phase I KEYNOTE-001 study, pembrolizumab demonstrated durable antitumor activity in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We sought to characterize the relationship between pembrolizumab dose, exposure, and response to define an effective dose for these patients. Patients and methods: Patients received pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg every 3 weeks (Q3W) (n = 55), 10 mg/kg Q3W (n = 238), or 10 mg/kg Q2W (n = 156). Response (RECIST v1.1) was assessed every 9 weeks. The relationship between the estimated pembrolizumab area under the concentration-time curve at steady state over 6 weeks (AUCss-6weeks) and the longitudinal change in tumor size (sum of longest diameters) was analyzed by regression and non-linear mixed effects modeling. This model was simultaneously fit to all tumor size data, then used to simulate response rates, normalizing the trial data across dose for prognostic covariates (tumor PD-L1 expression and EGFR mutation status). The exposure- safety relationship was assessed by logistic regression of pembrolizumab AUCss-6weeks versus occurrence of adverse events (AEs) of interest based on their immune etiology. Results: Overall response rates were 15% [95% confidence interval (CI) 7%-28%] at 2 mg/kg Q3W, 25% (18%-33%) at 10 mg/kg Q3W, and 21% (95% CI 14%-30%) at 10 mg/kg Q2W. Regression analyses of percentage change from baseline in tumor size versus AUCss-6weeks indicated a flat relationship (regression slope P > 0.05). Simulations showed the exposure-response relationship to be similarly flat, thus indicating that the lowest evaluated dose of 2 mg/kg Q3W to likely be at or near the efficacy plateau. Exposure-safety analysis showed the AE incidence to be similar among the clinically tested doses. Conclusions: No significant exposure dependency on efficacy or safety was identified for pembrolizumab across doses of 2-10 mg/kg. These results support the use of a 2 mg/kg Q3Wdosage in patients with previously treated, advanced NSCLC. ClinicalTrials.gov registry: NCT01295827.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofAnnals of Oncology-
dc.subjectExposure-response-
dc.subjectImmunotherapy-
dc.subjectNon-small-cell lung cancer-
dc.subjectPD-L1-
dc.subjectPembrolizumab-
dc.subjectTumor size modeling-
dc.titleSystematic evaluation of pembrolizumab dosing in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/annonc/mdw174-
dc.identifier.pmid27117531-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-84977119270-
dc.identifier.volume27-
dc.identifier.issue7-
dc.identifier.spage1291-
dc.identifier.epage1298-
dc.identifier.eissn1569-8041-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000379760700015-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats