File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Deep convolutional neural networks for semantic segmentation of cracks

TitleDeep convolutional neural networks for semantic segmentation of cracks
Authors
Keywordscomputer vision
convolutional neural network
crack
deep learning
encoder–decoder
semantic segmentation
Issue Date2022
Citation
Structural Control and Health Monitoring, 2022, v. 29, n. 1, article no. e2850 How to Cite?
AbstractA large crack detection dataset of 2446 manually labeled images is established to cover a wide range of noise and to evaluate the performance of end-to-end deep convolutional networks in detecting cracking. Five state-of-the-art end-to-end deep computer vision architectures for semantic segmentation are trained and evaluated, including Fully Convolutional Network (FCN), Global Convolutional Network (GCN), Pyramid Scene Parsing Network (PSPNet), UPerNet, and DeepLabv3+. For the backbones, the VGG, ResNet, and DenseNet are adopted. Based on the comparison of test set metrics, DeepLabv3+ with the ResNet101 backbone achieved the highest IoU of 0.6298, the highest recall of 0.6834, and the highest F1 score of 0.7732. The influence of database choice and image noise on crack detection performance is reported. Based on the comparison of predicted images, UperNet with ResNet101 backbone shows the highest performance for images with shadings, while DeepLabv3+ with ResNet101 backbone shows the best performance for images with blemishes. The research outcome can provide reference for the application of fast and accurate detection of cracks in civil engineering.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/326300
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 4.6
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.349
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWang, Jia Ji-
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Yu Fei-
dc.contributor.authorNie, Xin-
dc.contributor.authorMo, Y. L.-
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-09T09:59:36Z-
dc.date.available2023-03-09T09:59:36Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.citationStructural Control and Health Monitoring, 2022, v. 29, n. 1, article no. e2850-
dc.identifier.issn1545-2255-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/326300-
dc.description.abstractA large crack detection dataset of 2446 manually labeled images is established to cover a wide range of noise and to evaluate the performance of end-to-end deep convolutional networks in detecting cracking. Five state-of-the-art end-to-end deep computer vision architectures for semantic segmentation are trained and evaluated, including Fully Convolutional Network (FCN), Global Convolutional Network (GCN), Pyramid Scene Parsing Network (PSPNet), UPerNet, and DeepLabv3+. For the backbones, the VGG, ResNet, and DenseNet are adopted. Based on the comparison of test set metrics, DeepLabv3+ with the ResNet101 backbone achieved the highest IoU of 0.6298, the highest recall of 0.6834, and the highest F1 score of 0.7732. The influence of database choice and image noise on crack detection performance is reported. Based on the comparison of predicted images, UperNet with ResNet101 backbone shows the highest performance for images with shadings, while DeepLabv3+ with ResNet101 backbone shows the best performance for images with blemishes. The research outcome can provide reference for the application of fast and accurate detection of cracks in civil engineering.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofStructural Control and Health Monitoring-
dc.subjectcomputer vision-
dc.subjectconvolutional neural network-
dc.subjectcrack-
dc.subjectdeep learning-
dc.subjectencoder–decoder-
dc.subjectsemantic segmentation-
dc.titleDeep convolutional neural networks for semantic segmentation of cracks-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/stc.2850-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85116439841-
dc.identifier.volume29-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.spagearticle no. e2850-
dc.identifier.epagearticle no. e2850-
dc.identifier.eissn1545-2263-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000704295800001-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats