File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Conflict of interest and the credibility of underwriter analyst recommendations

TitleConflict of interest and the credibility of underwriter analyst recommendations
Authors
Issue Date1999
Citation
Review of Financial Studies, 1999, v. 12, n. 4, p. 653-686 How to Cite?
AbstractBrokerage analysts frequently comment on and sometimes recommend companies that their firms have recently taken public. We show that stocks that underwriter analysts recommend perform more poorly than "buy" recommendations by unaffiliated brokers prior to, at the time of, and subsequent to the recommendation date. We conclude that the recommendations by underwriter analysts show significant evidence of bias. We show also that the market does not recognize the full extent of this bias. The results suggest a potential conflict of interest inherent in the different functions that investment bankers perform.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/326025
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 6.8
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 17.654
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMichaely, Roni-
dc.contributor.authorWomack, Kent L.-
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-09T09:57:29Z-
dc.date.available2023-03-09T09:57:29Z-
dc.date.issued1999-
dc.identifier.citationReview of Financial Studies, 1999, v. 12, n. 4, p. 653-686-
dc.identifier.issn0893-9454-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/326025-
dc.description.abstractBrokerage analysts frequently comment on and sometimes recommend companies that their firms have recently taken public. We show that stocks that underwriter analysts recommend perform more poorly than "buy" recommendations by unaffiliated brokers prior to, at the time of, and subsequent to the recommendation date. We conclude that the recommendations by underwriter analysts show significant evidence of bias. We show also that the market does not recognize the full extent of this bias. The results suggest a potential conflict of interest inherent in the different functions that investment bankers perform.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofReview of Financial Studies-
dc.titleConflict of interest and the credibility of underwriter analyst recommendations-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/rfs/12.4.653-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-0033442404-
dc.identifier.volume12-
dc.identifier.issue4-
dc.identifier.spage653-
dc.identifier.epage686-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000082278600001-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats