File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

Supplementary

Conference Paper: Quantifying day-to-day evolution of choice patterns in public transit system with smart transit card data

TitleQuantifying day-to-day evolution of choice patterns in public transit system with smart transit card data
Authors
Issue Date2021
PublisherISTDM.
Citation
2021 International Symposium on Transportation Data and Modelling (ISTDM) (Virtual), Ann Arbor, Michigan, June 21-24 2021 How to Cite?
AbstractExisting studies proposed different models to capture day-to-day evolution of travelers’ choices and traffic dynamics. However, explicitly incorporating public transit service unreliability/reliability into day-to-day traffic modeling received very little attention. This study develops day-to-day models to explore how the unreliability of public transit service affects the day-to-day evolution of travel choices made by transit users in the Greater Sydney area. In particular, we consider two dynamical processes that incorporate transit service unreliability, i.e., travelers’ learning and perception updating process (LPUP) and proportional-switch adjustment pro- cess (PSAP). The conditions for the existence, uniqueness and stability of the fixed point of each model are analytically derived. These conditions are then examined using real-world public transit data from the Greater Sydney area. We find that with some aggregations and approximations, the system stability conditions at the fixed point are satisfied in both models. The observed weighted average flow change between two successive days is around 6.5% over the observation period, which may reflect the system stochasticity rather than instability. Among a series of empirical findings, it is noteworthy that in the Sydney case, the value of service schedule delay (late for schedule) is worth around 3.27 times of the in-vehicle time. Moreover, we find that the LPUP model more closely approximates real day-to-day travel choices than PSAP model, which reflects its stronger capability to capture the non-linear effects between cost perception and travel choices.
DescriptionT‑4: Regular Session/Behavior
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/326009

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMa, M-
dc.contributor.authorLiu, W-
dc.contributor.authorLi, X-
dc.contributor.authorZhang, F-
dc.contributor.authorJian, S-
dc.contributor.authorDixit, V-
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-06T01:28:56Z-
dc.date.available2023-03-06T01:28:56Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.citation2021 International Symposium on Transportation Data and Modelling (ISTDM) (Virtual), Ann Arbor, Michigan, June 21-24 2021-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/326009-
dc.descriptionT‑4: Regular Session/Behavior-
dc.description.abstractExisting studies proposed different models to capture day-to-day evolution of travelers’ choices and traffic dynamics. However, explicitly incorporating public transit service unreliability/reliability into day-to-day traffic modeling received very little attention. This study develops day-to-day models to explore how the unreliability of public transit service affects the day-to-day evolution of travel choices made by transit users in the Greater Sydney area. In particular, we consider two dynamical processes that incorporate transit service unreliability, i.e., travelers’ learning and perception updating process (LPUP) and proportional-switch adjustment pro- cess (PSAP). The conditions for the existence, uniqueness and stability of the fixed point of each model are analytically derived. These conditions are then examined using real-world public transit data from the Greater Sydney area. We find that with some aggregations and approximations, the system stability conditions at the fixed point are satisfied in both models. The observed weighted average flow change between two successive days is around 6.5% over the observation period, which may reflect the system stochasticity rather than instability. Among a series of empirical findings, it is noteworthy that in the Sydney case, the value of service schedule delay (late for schedule) is worth around 3.27 times of the in-vehicle time. Moreover, we find that the LPUP model more closely approximates real day-to-day travel choices than PSAP model, which reflects its stronger capability to capture the non-linear effects between cost perception and travel choices.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherISTDM.-
dc.titleQuantifying day-to-day evolution of choice patterns in public transit system with smart transit card data-
dc.typeConference_Paper-
dc.identifier.emailZhang, F: fnzhang@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityZhang, F=rp02657-
dc.identifier.hkuros344385-
dc.publisher.placeMichigan, United States-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats