File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Cognitive outcome in acute simvastatin treatment for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: A propensity matched analysis

TitleCognitive outcome in acute simvastatin treatment for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: A propensity matched analysis
Authors
KeywordsCognitive outcome
Mini-Mental State Examination
Montreal Cognitive Assessment
Propensity matched analysis
Simvastatin
Subarachnoid hemorrhage
Issue Date2015
Citation
Journal of the Neurological Sciences, 2015, v. 358, n. 1-2, p. 58-61 How to Cite?
AbstractObjectives Experimental evidence has indicated the benefit of simvastatin in the treatment of subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). Recently, acute simvastatin treatment was not shown to be beneficial in neurological outcome using modified Rankin Scale. Cognitive function is another important dimension of outcome assessment and yet had not been investigated in statin studies for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. We therefore explored whether acute simvastatin treatment would improve cognitive outcomes. Methods The study recruited SAH patients with acute simvastatin treatment enrolled in a randomized controlled double-blinded clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01038193). A control cohort of SAH patients without simvastatin treatment was identified with propensity score matching of age and admission grade. Primary outcome measure was Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). Secondary outcome measures were delayed ischaemic deficit (DID), delayed cerebral infarction, modified Rankin Scale (MRS), and Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). Results Fifty-one SAH patients with acute simvastatin treatment and 51 SAH patients without simvastatin treatment were recruited for analysis. At 3 months, there were no differences in MoCA scores (MoCA: 21 +/- 6 vs. 21 +/- 5, p = 0.772). MoCA-assessed cognitive impairment (MoCA < 26) was not different (75% vs. 80%, OR 0.7, 95%CI 0.3 to 1.8, p = 0.477). There were also no differences in DID, delayed cerebral infarction, favorable MRS outcome, and MMSE scores, and MMSE-assessed cognitive impairment between both groups. Conclusions The current study does not support that acute simvastatin treatment improves cognitive outcome after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/325682
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 3.6
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.042
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWong, George K.C.-
dc.contributor.authorWong, Adrian-
dc.contributor.authorZee, Beny C.Y.-
dc.contributor.authorPoon, Wai S.-
dc.contributor.authorChan, Matthew T.V.-
dc.contributor.authorGin, Tony-
dc.contributor.authorSiu, Deyond Y.W.-
dc.contributor.authorMok, Vincent C.T.-
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-27T07:35:24Z-
dc.date.available2023-02-27T07:35:24Z-
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of the Neurological Sciences, 2015, v. 358, n. 1-2, p. 58-61-
dc.identifier.issn0022-510X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/325682-
dc.description.abstractObjectives Experimental evidence has indicated the benefit of simvastatin in the treatment of subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). Recently, acute simvastatin treatment was not shown to be beneficial in neurological outcome using modified Rankin Scale. Cognitive function is another important dimension of outcome assessment and yet had not been investigated in statin studies for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. We therefore explored whether acute simvastatin treatment would improve cognitive outcomes. Methods The study recruited SAH patients with acute simvastatin treatment enrolled in a randomized controlled double-blinded clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01038193). A control cohort of SAH patients without simvastatin treatment was identified with propensity score matching of age and admission grade. Primary outcome measure was Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). Secondary outcome measures were delayed ischaemic deficit (DID), delayed cerebral infarction, modified Rankin Scale (MRS), and Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). Results Fifty-one SAH patients with acute simvastatin treatment and 51 SAH patients without simvastatin treatment were recruited for analysis. At 3 months, there were no differences in MoCA scores (MoCA: 21 +/- 6 vs. 21 +/- 5, p = 0.772). MoCA-assessed cognitive impairment (MoCA < 26) was not different (75% vs. 80%, OR 0.7, 95%CI 0.3 to 1.8, p = 0.477). There were also no differences in DID, delayed cerebral infarction, favorable MRS outcome, and MMSE scores, and MMSE-assessed cognitive impairment between both groups. Conclusions The current study does not support that acute simvastatin treatment improves cognitive outcome after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of the Neurological Sciences-
dc.subjectCognitive outcome-
dc.subjectMini-Mental State Examination-
dc.subjectMontreal Cognitive Assessment-
dc.subjectPropensity matched analysis-
dc.subjectSimvastatin-
dc.subjectSubarachnoid hemorrhage-
dc.titleCognitive outcome in acute simvastatin treatment for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: A propensity matched analysis-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jns.2015.08.013-
dc.identifier.pmid26285662-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-84946480808-
dc.identifier.volume358-
dc.identifier.issue1-2-
dc.identifier.spage58-
dc.identifier.epage61-
dc.identifier.eissn1878-5883-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000365050200009-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats