File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1007/s00259-022-06097-w
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85146174106
- PMID: 36633614
- WOS: WOS:000913086400001
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Low-count whole-body PET/MRI restoration: an evaluation of dose reduction spectrum and five state-of-the-art artificial intelligence models
Title | Low-count whole-body PET/MRI restoration: an evaluation of dose reduction spectrum and five state-of-the-art artificial intelligence models |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | CNN Deep learning PET restoration Transformer model Whole-body PET imaging |
Issue Date | 2023 |
Citation | European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 2023 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Purpose: To provide a holistic and complete comparison of the five most advanced AI models in the augmentation of low-dose 18F-FDG PET data over the entire dose reduction spectrum. Methods: In this multicenter study, five AI models were investigated for restoring low-count whole-body PET/MRI, covering convolutional benchmarks — U-Net, enhanced deep super-resolution network (EDSR), generative adversarial network (GAN) — and the most cutting-edge image reconstruction transformer models in computer vision to date — Swin transformer image restoration network (SwinIR) and EDSR-ViT (vision transformer). The models were evaluated against six groups of count levels representing the simulated 75%, 50%, 25%, 12.5%, 6.25%, and 1% (extremely ultra-low-count) of the clinical standard 3 MBq/kg 18F-FDG dose. The comparisons were performed upon two independent cohorts — (1) a primary cohort from Stanford University and (2) a cross-continental external validation cohort from Tübingen University — in order to ensure the findings are generalizable. A total of 476 original count and simulated low-count whole-body PET/MRI scans were incorporated into this analysis. Results: For low-count PET restoration on the primary cohort, the mean structural similarity index (SSIM) scores for dose 6.25% were 0.898 (95% CI, 0.887–0.910) for EDSR, 0.893 (0.881–0.905) for EDSR-ViT, 0.873 (0.859–0.887) for GAN, 0.885 (0.873–0.898) for U-Net, and 0.910 (0.900–0.920) for SwinIR. In continuation, SwinIR and U-Net’s performances were also discreetly evaluated at each simulated radiotracer dose levels. Using the primary Stanford cohort, the mean diagnostic image quality (DIQ; 5-point Likert scale) scores of SwinIR restoration were 5 (SD, 0) for dose 75%, 4.50 (0.535) for dose 50%, 3.75 (0.463) for dose 25%, 3.25 (0.463) for dose 12.5%, 4 (0.926) for dose 6.25%, and 2.5 (0.534) for dose 1%. Conclusion: Compared to low-count PET images, with near-to or nondiagnostic images at higher dose reduction levels (up to 6.25%), both SwinIR and U-Net significantly improve the diagnostic quality of PET images. A radiotracer dose reduction to 1% of the current clinical standard radiotracer dose is out of scope for current AI techniques. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/325592 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 8.6 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 2.280 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Wang, Yan Ran (Joyce) | - |
dc.contributor.author | Wang, Pengcheng | - |
dc.contributor.author | Adams, Lisa Christine | - |
dc.contributor.author | Sheybani, Natasha Diba | - |
dc.contributor.author | Qu, Liangqiong | - |
dc.contributor.author | Sarrami, Amir Hossein | - |
dc.contributor.author | Theruvath, Ashok Joseph | - |
dc.contributor.author | Gatidis, Sergios | - |
dc.contributor.author | Ho, Tina | - |
dc.contributor.author | Zhou, Quan | - |
dc.contributor.author | Pribnow, Allison | - |
dc.contributor.author | Thakor, Avnesh S. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Rubin, Daniel | - |
dc.contributor.author | Daldrup-Link, Heike E. | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-02-27T07:34:37Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-02-27T07:34:37Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2023 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 2023 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1619-7070 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/325592 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Purpose: To provide a holistic and complete comparison of the five most advanced AI models in the augmentation of low-dose 18F-FDG PET data over the entire dose reduction spectrum. Methods: In this multicenter study, five AI models were investigated for restoring low-count whole-body PET/MRI, covering convolutional benchmarks — U-Net, enhanced deep super-resolution network (EDSR), generative adversarial network (GAN) — and the most cutting-edge image reconstruction transformer models in computer vision to date — Swin transformer image restoration network (SwinIR) and EDSR-ViT (vision transformer). The models were evaluated against six groups of count levels representing the simulated 75%, 50%, 25%, 12.5%, 6.25%, and 1% (extremely ultra-low-count) of the clinical standard 3 MBq/kg 18F-FDG dose. The comparisons were performed upon two independent cohorts — (1) a primary cohort from Stanford University and (2) a cross-continental external validation cohort from Tübingen University — in order to ensure the findings are generalizable. A total of 476 original count and simulated low-count whole-body PET/MRI scans were incorporated into this analysis. Results: For low-count PET restoration on the primary cohort, the mean structural similarity index (SSIM) scores for dose 6.25% were 0.898 (95% CI, 0.887–0.910) for EDSR, 0.893 (0.881–0.905) for EDSR-ViT, 0.873 (0.859–0.887) for GAN, 0.885 (0.873–0.898) for U-Net, and 0.910 (0.900–0.920) for SwinIR. In continuation, SwinIR and U-Net’s performances were also discreetly evaluated at each simulated radiotracer dose levels. Using the primary Stanford cohort, the mean diagnostic image quality (DIQ; 5-point Likert scale) scores of SwinIR restoration were 5 (SD, 0) for dose 75%, 4.50 (0.535) for dose 50%, 3.75 (0.463) for dose 25%, 3.25 (0.463) for dose 12.5%, 4 (0.926) for dose 6.25%, and 2.5 (0.534) for dose 1%. Conclusion: Compared to low-count PET images, with near-to or nondiagnostic images at higher dose reduction levels (up to 6.25%), both SwinIR and U-Net significantly improve the diagnostic quality of PET images. A radiotracer dose reduction to 1% of the current clinical standard radiotracer dose is out of scope for current AI techniques. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging | - |
dc.subject | CNN | - |
dc.subject | Deep learning | - |
dc.subject | PET restoration | - |
dc.subject | Transformer model | - |
dc.subject | Whole-body PET imaging | - |
dc.title | Low-count whole-body PET/MRI restoration: an evaluation of dose reduction spectrum and five state-of-the-art artificial intelligence models | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/s00259-022-06097-w | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 36633614 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85146174106 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1619-7089 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000913086400001 | - |