File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Book Chapter: PROFESSIONAL IMPURITIES

TitlePROFESSIONAL IMPURITIES
Authors
KeywordsDirty work
Expertise
Impurities
Profession
Professionalism
Purity
Issue Date2020
Citation
Research in the Sociology of Work, 2020, v. 34, p. 147-167 How to Cite?
AbstractProfessionals often dislike dirty work, yet they accommodate or even embrace it in everyday practice. This chapter problematizes Andrew Abbott’s professional purity thesis by examining five major forms of impurities in professional work, namely impurity in expertise, impurity injurisdictions, impurity in clients, impurity in organizations, and impurity in politics. These impurities complicate the relationship between purity and status as some impurities may enhance professional status while others may jeopardize it, especially when the social origins of professionals are rapidly diversifying and professional work is increasingly intertwined with the logics of market and bureaucracy. Taking impurities seriously can help the sociology of professions move beyond the idealistic image of an independent, disinterested professional detached from human emotions, turf battles, client influence, and organizational or political forces and towards a more pragmatic understanding of professional work, expertise, ethics and the nature of professionalism.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/325574
ISSN
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.698

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Sida-
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-27T07:34:25Z-
dc.date.available2023-02-27T07:34:25Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.citationResearch in the Sociology of Work, 2020, v. 34, p. 147-167-
dc.identifier.issn0277-2833-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/325574-
dc.description.abstractProfessionals often dislike dirty work, yet they accommodate or even embrace it in everyday practice. This chapter problematizes Andrew Abbott’s professional purity thesis by examining five major forms of impurities in professional work, namely impurity in expertise, impurity injurisdictions, impurity in clients, impurity in organizations, and impurity in politics. These impurities complicate the relationship between purity and status as some impurities may enhance professional status while others may jeopardize it, especially when the social origins of professionals are rapidly diversifying and professional work is increasingly intertwined with the logics of market and bureaucracy. Taking impurities seriously can help the sociology of professions move beyond the idealistic image of an independent, disinterested professional detached from human emotions, turf battles, client influence, and organizational or political forces and towards a more pragmatic understanding of professional work, expertise, ethics and the nature of professionalism.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofResearch in the Sociology of Work-
dc.subjectDirty work-
dc.subjectExpertise-
dc.subjectImpurities-
dc.subjectProfession-
dc.subjectProfessionalism-
dc.subjectPurity-
dc.titlePROFESSIONAL IMPURITIES-
dc.typeBook_Chapter-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1108/S0277-283320200000034010-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85135183545-
dc.identifier.volume34-
dc.identifier.spage147-
dc.identifier.epage167-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats