File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1108/S0277-283320200000034010
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85135183545
- Find via
Supplementary
-
Citations:
- Scopus: 0
- Appears in Collections:
Book Chapter: PROFESSIONAL IMPURITIES
Title | PROFESSIONAL IMPURITIES |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Dirty work Expertise Impurities Profession Professionalism Purity |
Issue Date | 2020 |
Citation | Research in the Sociology of Work, 2020, v. 34, p. 147-167 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Professionals often dislike dirty work, yet they accommodate or even embrace it in everyday practice. This chapter problematizes Andrew Abbott’s professional purity thesis by examining five major forms of impurities in professional work, namely impurity in expertise, impurity injurisdictions, impurity in clients, impurity in organizations, and impurity in politics. These impurities complicate the relationship between purity and status as some impurities may enhance professional status while others may jeopardize it, especially when the social origins of professionals are rapidly diversifying and professional work is increasingly intertwined with the logics of market and bureaucracy. Taking impurities seriously can help the sociology of professions move beyond the idealistic image of an independent, disinterested professional detached from human emotions, turf battles, client influence, and organizational or political forces and towards a more pragmatic understanding of professional work, expertise, ethics and the nature of professionalism. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/325574 |
ISSN | 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.698 |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Liu, Sida | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-02-27T07:34:25Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-02-27T07:34:25Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Research in the Sociology of Work, 2020, v. 34, p. 147-167 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0277-2833 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/325574 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Professionals often dislike dirty work, yet they accommodate or even embrace it in everyday practice. This chapter problematizes Andrew Abbott’s professional purity thesis by examining five major forms of impurities in professional work, namely impurity in expertise, impurity injurisdictions, impurity in clients, impurity in organizations, and impurity in politics. These impurities complicate the relationship between purity and status as some impurities may enhance professional status while others may jeopardize it, especially when the social origins of professionals are rapidly diversifying and professional work is increasingly intertwined with the logics of market and bureaucracy. Taking impurities seriously can help the sociology of professions move beyond the idealistic image of an independent, disinterested professional detached from human emotions, turf battles, client influence, and organizational or political forces and towards a more pragmatic understanding of professional work, expertise, ethics and the nature of professionalism. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Research in the Sociology of Work | - |
dc.subject | Dirty work | - |
dc.subject | Expertise | - |
dc.subject | Impurities | - |
dc.subject | Profession | - |
dc.subject | Professionalism | - |
dc.subject | Purity | - |
dc.title | PROFESSIONAL IMPURITIES | - |
dc.type | Book_Chapter | - |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1108/S0277-283320200000034010 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85135183545 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 34 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 147 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 167 | - |