File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1111/gove.12594
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85105024165
- WOS: WOS:000646894400001
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Institutional proximity and judicial corruption: A spatial approach
Title | Institutional proximity and judicial corruption: A spatial approach |
---|---|
Authors | |
Issue Date | 2022 |
Citation | Governance, 2022, v. 35, n. 2, p. 633-649 How to Cite? |
Abstract | This article develops a relational explanation for judicial corruption, namely, a spatial theory of institutional proximity, to complement existing behavioral and institutional approaches. Institutional proximity refers to the spatial proximity between adjacent political or social institutions, including courts. This proximity can be a result of political or administrative regulations, workplace interactions, or the mobility of individual actors between them. Linking ecologies and space travelers are two key spatial mechanisms through which institutional proximity enables judicial corruption. They pave the pathways of judicial corruption, that is, how corrupt transactions and related social interactions are facilitated by and communicated through institutions adjacent to the court. The theory is operationalized in the context of Chinese courts and the various pathways of judicial corruption are exemplified through a number of publicly reported cases in China. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/325523 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 2.6 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.302 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Wang, Juan | - |
dc.contributor.author | Liu, Sida | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-02-27T07:33:59Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-02-27T07:33:59Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2022 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Governance, 2022, v. 35, n. 2, p. 633-649 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0952-1895 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/325523 | - |
dc.description.abstract | This article develops a relational explanation for judicial corruption, namely, a spatial theory of institutional proximity, to complement existing behavioral and institutional approaches. Institutional proximity refers to the spatial proximity between adjacent political or social institutions, including courts. This proximity can be a result of political or administrative regulations, workplace interactions, or the mobility of individual actors between them. Linking ecologies and space travelers are two key spatial mechanisms through which institutional proximity enables judicial corruption. They pave the pathways of judicial corruption, that is, how corrupt transactions and related social interactions are facilitated by and communicated through institutions adjacent to the court. The theory is operationalized in the context of Chinese courts and the various pathways of judicial corruption are exemplified through a number of publicly reported cases in China. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Governance | - |
dc.title | Institutional proximity and judicial corruption: A spatial approach | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/gove.12594 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85105024165 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 35 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 2 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 633 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 649 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1468-0491 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000646894400001 | - |