File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Between social spaces

TitleBetween social spaces
Authors
KeywordsBoundary work
heterogeneity
social distance
social space
Issue Date2021
Citation
European Journal of Social Theory, 2021, v. 24, n. 1, p. 123-139 How to Cite?
AbstractSociologists often imagine society as spaces, yet how social spaces are related remains ambiguous in most theories. In developing his field theory, Bourdieu used extensively the concept of homology to describe the structural similarities across fields, but he had not taken seriously the spaces between fields or how fields are related to each other. Adopting the Simmelian approach of formal sociology, this article outlines six basic social forms by which social spaces are related. It argues that relations between social spaces can be understood along two dimensions: heterogeneity and social distance. In terms of heterogeneity, social spaces can be kindred, symbiotic or oppositional. In terms of social distance, they can be linked, nested or overlapping. These social forms of interspatial relations are constituted by the boundary work of a variety of actors, including guardians, brokers and space travellers. The article provides a general vocabulary for thinking about how social spaces are related and how they interact across boundaries.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/325466
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 2.3
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.929
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Sida-
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-27T07:33:32Z-
dc.date.available2023-02-27T07:33:32Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.citationEuropean Journal of Social Theory, 2021, v. 24, n. 1, p. 123-139-
dc.identifier.issn1368-4310-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/325466-
dc.description.abstractSociologists often imagine society as spaces, yet how social spaces are related remains ambiguous in most theories. In developing his field theory, Bourdieu used extensively the concept of homology to describe the structural similarities across fields, but he had not taken seriously the spaces between fields or how fields are related to each other. Adopting the Simmelian approach of formal sociology, this article outlines six basic social forms by which social spaces are related. It argues that relations between social spaces can be understood along two dimensions: heterogeneity and social distance. In terms of heterogeneity, social spaces can be kindred, symbiotic or oppositional. In terms of social distance, they can be linked, nested or overlapping. These social forms of interspatial relations are constituted by the boundary work of a variety of actors, including guardians, brokers and space travellers. The article provides a general vocabulary for thinking about how social spaces are related and how they interact across boundaries.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean Journal of Social Theory-
dc.subjectBoundary work-
dc.subjectheterogeneity-
dc.subjectsocial distance-
dc.subjectsocial space-
dc.titleBetween social spaces-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/1368431020905258-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85079397013-
dc.identifier.volume24-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.spage123-
dc.identifier.epage139-
dc.identifier.eissn1461-7137-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000513327300001-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats