File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1016/j.jocn.2019.01.022
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85060769126
- PMID: 30712777
- WOS: WOS:000466249000025
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Determining a cut-off residual tumor volume threshold for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma treated with temozolomide chemoradiotherapy: A multicenter cohort study
Title | Determining a cut-off residual tumor volume threshold for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma treated with temozolomide chemoradiotherapy: A multicenter cohort study |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Extent of resection Glioblastoma Overall survival Residual tumor volume Temozolomide chemo-radiotherapy Volumetric analysis |
Issue Date | 2019 |
Citation | Journal of Clinical Neuroscience, 2019, v. 63, p. 134-141 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Standard-of-care treatment of glioblastomas involves maximal safe resection and adjuvant temozolomide chemo-radiotherapy. Although extent of resection (EOR) is a well-known surgical predictor for overall survival most lesions cannot be completely resected. We hypothesize that in the event of incomplete resection, residual tumor volume (RTV) may be a more significant predictor than EOR. This was a multicenter retrospective review of 147 adult glioblastoma patients (mean age 53 years) that underwent standard treatment. Semiautomatic magnetic resonance imaging segmentation was performed for pre- and postoperative scans for volumetric analysis. Cox proportional hazards regression and Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were performed for prognostic factors including: age, Karnofsky performance score (KPS), O(6)-methylguanine methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation status, EOR and RTV. EOR and RTV cut-off values for improved OS were determined and internally validated by receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analysis for 12-month overall survival. Half of the tumors had MGMT promoter methylation (77, 52%). The median tumor volume, EOR and RTV were 43.20 cc, 93.5%, and 3.80 cc respectively. Gross total resection was achieved in 52 patients (35%). Cox proportional hazards regression, ROC and maximum Youden index analyses for RTV and EOR showed that a cut-off value of <3.50 cc (HR 0.69; 95% CI 0.48–0.98) and ≥84% (HR 0.64; 95% CI 0.43–0.96) respectively conferred an overall survival advantage. Independent overall survival predictors were MGMT promoter methylation (adjusted HR 0.35; 95% CI 0.23–0.55) and a RTV of <3.50 cc (adjusted HR 0.53; 95% CI 0.29–0.95), but not EOR for incompletely resected glioblastomas. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/325427 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 1.9 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.609 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Woo, Peter Y.M. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Ho, Jason M.K. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Tse, Teresa P.K. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lam, Sandy W. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Mak, Calvin H.K. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Chan, Danny T.M. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lee, Michael W.Y. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Wong, Sui To | - |
dc.contributor.author | Chan, Kwong Yau | - |
dc.contributor.author | Poon, Wai Sang | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-02-27T07:33:12Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-02-27T07:33:12Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Journal of Clinical Neuroscience, 2019, v. 63, p. 134-141 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0967-5868 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/325427 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Standard-of-care treatment of glioblastomas involves maximal safe resection and adjuvant temozolomide chemo-radiotherapy. Although extent of resection (EOR) is a well-known surgical predictor for overall survival most lesions cannot be completely resected. We hypothesize that in the event of incomplete resection, residual tumor volume (RTV) may be a more significant predictor than EOR. This was a multicenter retrospective review of 147 adult glioblastoma patients (mean age 53 years) that underwent standard treatment. Semiautomatic magnetic resonance imaging segmentation was performed for pre- and postoperative scans for volumetric analysis. Cox proportional hazards regression and Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were performed for prognostic factors including: age, Karnofsky performance score (KPS), O(6)-methylguanine methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation status, EOR and RTV. EOR and RTV cut-off values for improved OS were determined and internally validated by receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analysis for 12-month overall survival. Half of the tumors had MGMT promoter methylation (77, 52%). The median tumor volume, EOR and RTV were 43.20 cc, 93.5%, and 3.80 cc respectively. Gross total resection was achieved in 52 patients (35%). Cox proportional hazards regression, ROC and maximum Youden index analyses for RTV and EOR showed that a cut-off value of <3.50 cc (HR 0.69; 95% CI 0.48–0.98) and ≥84% (HR 0.64; 95% CI 0.43–0.96) respectively conferred an overall survival advantage. Independent overall survival predictors were MGMT promoter methylation (adjusted HR 0.35; 95% CI 0.23–0.55) and a RTV of <3.50 cc (adjusted HR 0.53; 95% CI 0.29–0.95), but not EOR for incompletely resected glioblastomas. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of Clinical Neuroscience | - |
dc.subject | Extent of resection | - |
dc.subject | Glioblastoma | - |
dc.subject | Overall survival | - |
dc.subject | Residual tumor volume | - |
dc.subject | Temozolomide chemo-radiotherapy | - |
dc.subject | Volumetric analysis | - |
dc.title | Determining a cut-off residual tumor volume threshold for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma treated with temozolomide chemoradiotherapy: A multicenter cohort study | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.jocn.2019.01.022 | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 30712777 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85060769126 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 63 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 134 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 141 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1532-2653 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000466249000025 | - |