File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1177/0735275116632556
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-84962905827
- WOS: WOS:000373972000004
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Field and Ecology
Title | Field and Ecology |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Bourdieu Chicago School ecology field social space |
Issue Date | 2016 |
Citation | Sociological Theory, 2016, v. 34, n. 1, p. 62-79 How to Cite? |
Abstract | This article offers a theoretical comparison between field and ecology, as developed by Pierre Bourdieu and the Chicago School of sociology. While field theory and ecological theory share similar conceptualizations of actors, positions, and relations, and while they converge in their views on structural isomorphism, temporality, and social psychology, they are quite different on several other scores: power and inequality, endogeneity, heterogeneity, metaphorical sources, and abstraction. With a fine-grained comparison of the two approaches, this article provides the basis for a continuous dialogue among social theorists and empirical researchers regarding the nature of social space, its structural and processual composition, and how it changes over time. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/324954 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 4.1 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 2.068 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Liu, Sida | - |
dc.contributor.author | Emirbayer, Mustafa | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-02-27T07:28:32Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-02-27T07:28:32Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2016 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Sociological Theory, 2016, v. 34, n. 1, p. 62-79 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0735-2751 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/324954 | - |
dc.description.abstract | This article offers a theoretical comparison between field and ecology, as developed by Pierre Bourdieu and the Chicago School of sociology. While field theory and ecological theory share similar conceptualizations of actors, positions, and relations, and while they converge in their views on structural isomorphism, temporality, and social psychology, they are quite different on several other scores: power and inequality, endogeneity, heterogeneity, metaphorical sources, and abstraction. With a fine-grained comparison of the two approaches, this article provides the basis for a continuous dialogue among social theorists and empirical researchers regarding the nature of social space, its structural and processual composition, and how it changes over time. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Sociological Theory | - |
dc.subject | Bourdieu | - |
dc.subject | Chicago School | - |
dc.subject | ecology | - |
dc.subject | field | - |
dc.subject | social space | - |
dc.title | Field and Ecology | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1177/0735275116632556 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-84962905827 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 34 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 1 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 62 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 79 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1467-9558 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000373972000004 | - |