File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Unstaged cancer: Long-term decline in incidence by site and by demographic and socioeconomic characteristics

TitleUnstaged cancer: Long-term decline in incidence by site and by demographic and socioeconomic characteristics
Authors
KeywordsCancer
Health disparities
Incidence
SEER
Socioeconomic status
Staging
Issue Date2017
Citation
Cancer Causes and Control, 2017, v. 28, n. 4, p. 341-349 How to Cite?
AbstractPurpose: The study of trends in stage at diagnosis contributes to understand disease burden and the effects of cancer control activities. However, a proportion of cancers reported to registries have insufficient information to assign stage. The limited research addressing unstaged cancers has noted racial and socioeconomic disparities. Long-term incidence trends for unstaged cancers have not been described. We examined long-term trends in diagnosis of unstaged cancers in the U.S. Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) reporting areas. Methods: Incidence of unstaged invasive cancers for primary sites that have a staging scheme was analyzed for the years 1992–2011. JoinPoint regression was used to describe incidence rate trends of unstaged cancers, with analysis stratified by cancer site and by socioeconomic and demographic variables. Results: From 1992 to 1996, 8.6% of invasive cancers were unstaged. A steep decline in the incidence of unstaged cancers, represented by an annual percent change (APC) of −9.16%, was observed from 1997 to 2001, followed by a modest decline. By the end of the study period, 2007–2011, unstaged cancers represented 4.9% of invasive cancers. Unstaged cancers are disproportionately more common for older individuals and those in lower socioeconomic communities. Conclusion: The incidence of unstaged cancers decreased markedly over the period studied. Change in ability to assign stage was seen, possibly related to increased use of advanced imaging like PET scans, and should be considered when evaluating changes in cancer stage distributions over time.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/324005
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 2.2
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.934
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHerget, Kimberly-
dc.contributor.authorStroup, Antoinette-
dc.contributor.authorSmith, Ken-
dc.contributor.authorWen, Ming-
dc.contributor.authorSweeney, Carol-
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-13T03:00:50Z-
dc.date.available2023-01-13T03:00:50Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.citationCancer Causes and Control, 2017, v. 28, n. 4, p. 341-349-
dc.identifier.issn0957-5243-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/324005-
dc.description.abstractPurpose: The study of trends in stage at diagnosis contributes to understand disease burden and the effects of cancer control activities. However, a proportion of cancers reported to registries have insufficient information to assign stage. The limited research addressing unstaged cancers has noted racial and socioeconomic disparities. Long-term incidence trends for unstaged cancers have not been described. We examined long-term trends in diagnosis of unstaged cancers in the U.S. Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) reporting areas. Methods: Incidence of unstaged invasive cancers for primary sites that have a staging scheme was analyzed for the years 1992–2011. JoinPoint regression was used to describe incidence rate trends of unstaged cancers, with analysis stratified by cancer site and by socioeconomic and demographic variables. Results: From 1992 to 1996, 8.6% of invasive cancers were unstaged. A steep decline in the incidence of unstaged cancers, represented by an annual percent change (APC) of −9.16%, was observed from 1997 to 2001, followed by a modest decline. By the end of the study period, 2007–2011, unstaged cancers represented 4.9% of invasive cancers. Unstaged cancers are disproportionately more common for older individuals and those in lower socioeconomic communities. Conclusion: The incidence of unstaged cancers decreased markedly over the period studied. Change in ability to assign stage was seen, possibly related to increased use of advanced imaging like PET scans, and should be considered when evaluating changes in cancer stage distributions over time.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofCancer Causes and Control-
dc.subjectCancer-
dc.subjectHealth disparities-
dc.subjectIncidence-
dc.subjectSEER-
dc.subjectSocioeconomic status-
dc.subjectStaging-
dc.titleUnstaged cancer: Long-term decline in incidence by site and by demographic and socioeconomic characteristics-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10552-017-0874-2-
dc.identifier.pmid28255677-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85014114202-
dc.identifier.volume28-
dc.identifier.issue4-
dc.identifier.spage341-
dc.identifier.epage349-
dc.identifier.eissn1573-7225-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000398480200008-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats