File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1017/CBO9780511511233.001
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-84928428998
Supplementary
-
Citations:
- Scopus: 0
- Appears in Collections:
Book Chapter: Introduction: Reflections on dialogues between practitioners and theorists of human rights
Title | Introduction: Reflections on dialogues between practitioners and theorists of human rights |
---|---|
Authors | |
Issue Date | 2007 |
Publisher | Cambridge University Press |
Citation | Introduction: Reflections on Dialogues between Practitioners and Theorists of Human Rights. In Bell, DA, Coicaud, JM (Eds.), Ethics in Action: The Ethical Challenges of International Human Rights Nongovernmental Organizations, p. 1-22. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007 How to Cite? |
Abstract | International human rights and humanitarian nongovernmental organizations (INGOs) are major players on the world stage. They fund human rights projects, actively participate in human rights and humanitarian work, and criticize human rights violations in foreign lands. They work in cooperative networks with each other, with local NGOs, and with international organizations. They consult and lobby governments and international organizations, sometimes participating in high-level negotiations and diplomacy for global policy development. They cooperate and negotiate with economic and political organizations in the field for the implementation of their projects, whether this be monitoring or assistance. In short, they are generating a new type of political power, the purpose of which is to secure the vital interests of human beings on an international scale, regardless of state boundaries. Needless to say, good intentions are not always sufficient to produce desirable results. In an imperfect and unpredictable world, human rights INGOs often face ethical dilemmas that constrain their efforts to do good in foreign lands. How do people who want to do good behave when they meet obstacles? Is it justifiable to sacrifice some good in the short term for more good in the long term? And which human rights concerns should have priority? Like other organizations, INGOs are constrained by scarce time and resources and must choose between competing goods. Human rights practitioners experience hard choices, compromises, and prioritizing as ongoing features of their moral world. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/323946 |
ISBN |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Bell, Daniel A. | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-01-13T03:00:26Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-01-13T03:00:26Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2007 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Introduction: Reflections on Dialogues between Practitioners and Theorists of Human Rights. In Bell, DA, Coicaud, JM (Eds.), Ethics in Action: The Ethical Challenges of International Human Rights Nongovernmental Organizations, p. 1-22. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007 | - |
dc.identifier.isbn | 9780521865661 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/323946 | - |
dc.description.abstract | International human rights and humanitarian nongovernmental organizations (INGOs) are major players on the world stage. They fund human rights projects, actively participate in human rights and humanitarian work, and criticize human rights violations in foreign lands. They work in cooperative networks with each other, with local NGOs, and with international organizations. They consult and lobby governments and international organizations, sometimes participating in high-level negotiations and diplomacy for global policy development. They cooperate and negotiate with economic and political organizations in the field for the implementation of their projects, whether this be monitoring or assistance. In short, they are generating a new type of political power, the purpose of which is to secure the vital interests of human beings on an international scale, regardless of state boundaries. Needless to say, good intentions are not always sufficient to produce desirable results. In an imperfect and unpredictable world, human rights INGOs often face ethical dilemmas that constrain their efforts to do good in foreign lands. How do people who want to do good behave when they meet obstacles? Is it justifiable to sacrifice some good in the short term for more good in the long term? And which human rights concerns should have priority? Like other organizations, INGOs are constrained by scarce time and resources and must choose between competing goods. Human rights practitioners experience hard choices, compromises, and prioritizing as ongoing features of their moral world. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.publisher | Cambridge University Press | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Ethics in Action: The Ethical Challenges of International Human Rights Nongovernmental Organizations | - |
dc.title | Introduction: Reflections on dialogues between practitioners and theorists of human rights | - |
dc.type | Book_Chapter | - |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1017/CBO9780511511233.001 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-84928428998 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 1 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 22 | - |
dc.publisher.place | Cambridge | - |