File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000220829.87073.f7
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-33749036559
- PMID: 17001262
- WOS: WOS:000241115500005
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Immigrant perceptions of discrimination in health care: The California health interview survey 2003
Title | Immigrant perceptions of discrimination in health care: The California health interview survey 2003 |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Discrimination Health disparities Immigrants |
Issue Date | 2006 |
Citation | Medical Care, 2006, v. 44, n. 10, p. 914-920 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Background: U.S. healthcare disparities may be in part the result of differential experiences of discrimination in health care. Previous research about discrimination has focused on race/ethnicity. Because immigrants are clustered in certain racial and ethnic groups, failure to consider immigration status could distort race/ethnicity effects. Objectives: We examined whether foreign-born persons are more likely to report discrimination in healthcare than U.S.-born persons in the same race/ethnic group, whether the immigration effect varies by race/ethnicity, and whether the immigration effect is "explained" by sociodemographic factors. Research Design: The authors conducted a cross-sectional analysis of the 2003 California Health Interview Survey consisting of 42,044 adult respondents. Logistic regression models use replicate weights to adjust for nonresponse and complex survey design. Outcome Measure: The outcome measure of this study was respondent reports that there was a time when they would have gotten better medical care if they had belonged to a different race or ethnic group. Results: Seven percent of blacks and Latinos and 4% of Asians reported healthcare discrimination within the past 5 years. Immigrants were more likely to report discrimination than U.S.-born persons adjusting for race/ethnicity. For Asians, only the foreign-born were more likely than whites to report discrimination. For Latinos, increased perceptions of discrimination were attributable to sociodemographic factors for the U.S.-born but not for the foreign-born. Speaking a language other than English at home increased discrimination reports regardless of birthplace; private insurance was protective for the U.S.-born only. Conclusions: Immigration status should be included in studies of healthcare disparities because nativity is a key determinant of discrimination experiences for Asians and Latinos. Copyright © 2006 by Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/323794 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 3.3 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.384 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Lauderdale, Diane S. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Wen, Ming | - |
dc.contributor.author | Jacobs, Elizabeth A. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kandula, Namratha R. | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-01-13T02:59:23Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-01-13T02:59:23Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2006 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Medical Care, 2006, v. 44, n. 10, p. 914-920 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0025-7079 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/323794 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Background: U.S. healthcare disparities may be in part the result of differential experiences of discrimination in health care. Previous research about discrimination has focused on race/ethnicity. Because immigrants are clustered in certain racial and ethnic groups, failure to consider immigration status could distort race/ethnicity effects. Objectives: We examined whether foreign-born persons are more likely to report discrimination in healthcare than U.S.-born persons in the same race/ethnic group, whether the immigration effect varies by race/ethnicity, and whether the immigration effect is "explained" by sociodemographic factors. Research Design: The authors conducted a cross-sectional analysis of the 2003 California Health Interview Survey consisting of 42,044 adult respondents. Logistic regression models use replicate weights to adjust for nonresponse and complex survey design. Outcome Measure: The outcome measure of this study was respondent reports that there was a time when they would have gotten better medical care if they had belonged to a different race or ethnic group. Results: Seven percent of blacks and Latinos and 4% of Asians reported healthcare discrimination within the past 5 years. Immigrants were more likely to report discrimination than U.S.-born persons adjusting for race/ethnicity. For Asians, only the foreign-born were more likely than whites to report discrimination. For Latinos, increased perceptions of discrimination were attributable to sociodemographic factors for the U.S.-born but not for the foreign-born. Speaking a language other than English at home increased discrimination reports regardless of birthplace; private insurance was protective for the U.S.-born only. Conclusions: Immigration status should be included in studies of healthcare disparities because nativity is a key determinant of discrimination experiences for Asians and Latinos. Copyright © 2006 by Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Medical Care | - |
dc.subject | Discrimination | - |
dc.subject | Health disparities | - |
dc.subject | Immigrants | - |
dc.title | Immigrant perceptions of discrimination in health care: The California health interview survey 2003 | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1097/01.mlr.0000220829.87073.f7 | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 17001262 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-33749036559 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 44 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 10 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 914 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 920 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000241115500005 | - |