File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Inaccuracy of buccal bone thickness estimation on cone-beam CT due to implant blooming: An ex-vivo study

TitleInaccuracy of buccal bone thickness estimation on cone-beam CT due to implant blooming: An ex-vivo study
Authors
Keywordsartifacts
cone-beam computed tomography
cortical bone
dental implants
imaging
Issue Date2019
Citation
Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 2019, v. 46, n. 11, p. 1134-1143 How to Cite?
AbstractAim: The aim of this article was to evaluate the accuracy of buccal bone thickness measurements around implants on CBCT. Material and methods: Forty-four Osseospeed EV implants (3.6 in Ø) were placed guided and flapless in five fresh frozen human cadaver heads. The buccal peri-implant bone was measured clinically via guided bone sounding. Post-op CBCTs were taken with two different CBCT scanners (NewTom® and Accuitomo®) on which the buccal bone was measured. Consequently, after implant removal, a new CBCT was made without implant artefacts (image reference standard) on which the real buccal bone thickness was scored. Results: Due to an average blooming (artificial increase of implant diameter) percentage of 12%–15%, the buccal peri-implant bone thickness was underestimated by 0.3 mm on both CBCT devices. Immediately adjacent to the implant blooming area, a doubtful zone of about 0.45 mm was observed in which the buccal bone was not always visible. Buccal bone that was thick enough to fall outside this doubtful zone could always be visualized. Conclusion: The findings in this study may help the clinician in the decision-making process whether or not to intervene surgically in areas with ambiguous CBCT results.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/323490
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 5.8
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 2.249
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorVanderstuyft, Tony-
dc.contributor.authorTarce, Mihai-
dc.contributor.authorSanaan, Bahoz-
dc.contributor.authorJacobs, Reinhilde-
dc.contributor.authorde Faria Vasconcelos, Karla-
dc.contributor.authorQuirynen, Marc-
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-06T14:10:08Z-
dc.date.available2023-01-06T14:10:08Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Clinical Periodontology, 2019, v. 46, n. 11, p. 1134-1143-
dc.identifier.issn0303-6979-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/323490-
dc.description.abstractAim: The aim of this article was to evaluate the accuracy of buccal bone thickness measurements around implants on CBCT. Material and methods: Forty-four Osseospeed EV implants (3.6 in Ø) were placed guided and flapless in five fresh frozen human cadaver heads. The buccal peri-implant bone was measured clinically via guided bone sounding. Post-op CBCTs were taken with two different CBCT scanners (NewTom® and Accuitomo®) on which the buccal bone was measured. Consequently, after implant removal, a new CBCT was made without implant artefacts (image reference standard) on which the real buccal bone thickness was scored. Results: Due to an average blooming (artificial increase of implant diameter) percentage of 12%–15%, the buccal peri-implant bone thickness was underestimated by 0.3 mm on both CBCT devices. Immediately adjacent to the implant blooming area, a doubtful zone of about 0.45 mm was observed in which the buccal bone was not always visible. Buccal bone that was thick enough to fall outside this doubtful zone could always be visualized. Conclusion: The findings in this study may help the clinician in the decision-making process whether or not to intervene surgically in areas with ambiguous CBCT results.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Clinical Periodontology-
dc.subjectartifacts-
dc.subjectcone-beam computed tomography-
dc.subjectcortical bone-
dc.subjectdental implants-
dc.subjectimaging-
dc.titleInaccuracy of buccal bone thickness estimation on cone-beam CT due to implant blooming: An ex-vivo study-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jcpe.13183-
dc.identifier.pmid31446644-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85073578061-
dc.identifier.volume46-
dc.identifier.issue11-
dc.identifier.spage1134-
dc.identifier.epage1143-
dc.identifier.eissn1600-051X-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000485448800001-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats