File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Methyl methacrylate in poly(methyl methacrylate) - Validation of direct injection gas chromatography

TitleMethyl methacrylate in poly(methyl methacrylate) - Validation of direct injection gas chromatography
Authors
KeywordsDirect injection gas chromatography
Methyl methacrylate
Poly(methyl methacrylate)
Quantitative NMR
Issue Date2004
Citation
Journal of Chromatography A, 2004, v. 1061, n. 1, p. 93-98 How to Cite?
AbstractGas chromatography (GC) was investigated for the determination of residual methyl methacrylate (MMA) in heat-processed poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) denture base material emphasizing recovery and validation. Standard solutions of MMA and emulsion-polymerized PMMA in dichloromethane were analysed, before and after distillation by a room-temperature air stream into a liquid nitrogen trap, and in the presence of PMMA by direct injection. Quantitative NMR analysis using dimethyl sulphoxide as internal calibration standard in deuterated chloroform solutions provided validation. Good concordance was observed between results under all conditions; no problems arose from direct injection of PMMA solution for GC. Good straight line responses in log-log plots were generally observed. For GC and MMA: log-log calibration curve (slope: 0.9552 ± 0.0051, r 2: 0.9992, n = 32) indicated some non-linearity (t = 8.875, p ∼4 × 10 -10). Distillation gave slope: 0.9751 ± 0.0213 (NS versus unity; t = 1.172, p > 0.25). For PMMA solutions, distillation (r 2: 0.9301) gave greater scatter than direct injection (r 2: 0.9704). For NMR: log-log plot of calculated versus actual MMA (slope: 0.9363 ± 0.0157, r 2: 0.9969, n = 13) again indicated non-linearity (t = 4.0682, p = 0.0019). PMMA solutions gave slope: 0.9477 ± 0.0328, r 2 = 0.9858 (NS versus unity; t = 1.5941, p = 0.13). Determination of MMA in PMMA by GC is recommended. © 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/322071
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 3.8
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.717
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLung, Christie Y.K.-
dc.contributor.authorDarvell, Brian W.-
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-03T02:23:24Z-
dc.date.available2022-11-03T02:23:24Z-
dc.date.issued2004-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Chromatography A, 2004, v. 1061, n. 1, p. 93-98-
dc.identifier.issn0021-9673-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/322071-
dc.description.abstractGas chromatography (GC) was investigated for the determination of residual methyl methacrylate (MMA) in heat-processed poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) denture base material emphasizing recovery and validation. Standard solutions of MMA and emulsion-polymerized PMMA in dichloromethane were analysed, before and after distillation by a room-temperature air stream into a liquid nitrogen trap, and in the presence of PMMA by direct injection. Quantitative NMR analysis using dimethyl sulphoxide as internal calibration standard in deuterated chloroform solutions provided validation. Good concordance was observed between results under all conditions; no problems arose from direct injection of PMMA solution for GC. Good straight line responses in log-log plots were generally observed. For GC and MMA: log-log calibration curve (slope: 0.9552 ± 0.0051, r 2: 0.9992, n = 32) indicated some non-linearity (t = 8.875, p ∼4 × 10 -10). Distillation gave slope: 0.9751 ± 0.0213 (NS versus unity; t = 1.172, p > 0.25). For PMMA solutions, distillation (r 2: 0.9301) gave greater scatter than direct injection (r 2: 0.9704). For NMR: log-log plot of calculated versus actual MMA (slope: 0.9363 ± 0.0157, r 2: 0.9969, n = 13) again indicated non-linearity (t = 4.0682, p = 0.0019). PMMA solutions gave slope: 0.9477 ± 0.0328, r 2 = 0.9858 (NS versus unity; t = 1.5941, p = 0.13). Determination of MMA in PMMA by GC is recommended. © 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Chromatography A-
dc.subjectDirect injection gas chromatography-
dc.subjectMethyl methacrylate-
dc.subjectPoly(methyl methacrylate)-
dc.subjectQuantitative NMR-
dc.titleMethyl methacrylate in poly(methyl methacrylate) - Validation of direct injection gas chromatography-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.chroma.2004.10.088-
dc.identifier.pmid15633748-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-9644290853-
dc.identifier.volume1061-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.spage93-
dc.identifier.epage98-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000225746500011-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats