File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Evaluation of ten machine learning methods for estimating terrestrial evapotranspiration from remote sensing

TitleEvaluation of ten machine learning methods for estimating terrestrial evapotranspiration from remote sensing
Authors
KeywordsAlbedo
Bootstrap aggregation tree
Computational efficiency
Evapotranspiration
Flux tower
FPAR
GLASS
Latent heat exchange
Leaf area index
Machine learning
MODIS
Nadir adjusted reflectance
Neural network
Random kernel
Regression tree
Regularized linear regression
Remote sensing
Surface energy balance
Surface radiation
Vegetation index
Issue Date2019
Citation
International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 2019, v. 78, p. 86-92 How to Cite?
AbstractRemote sensing retrieval of evapotranspiration (ET), or surface latent heat exchange (LE), is of great utility for many applications. Machine learning (ML) methods have been extensively used in many disciplines, but so far little work has been performed systematically comparing ML methods for ET retrieval. This paper provides an evaluation of ten ML methods for estimating daily ET based on daily Global LAnd Surface Satellite (GLASS) radiation data and high-level Moderate-Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) data products and ground measured ET data from 184 flux tower sites. Measurements of accuracy (RMSE, R2, and bias) and run time were made for each of ten ML methods with a smaller training data set (n = 7910 data points) and a larger training data set (n= 69,752 data points). Inclusion of more input variables improved algorithm performance but had little effect on run time. The best results were obtained with the larger training data set using the bootstrap aggregation (bagging) regression tree (validation RMSE = 19.91 W/m2) and three hidden layer neural network (validation RMSE = 20.94 W/m2), although the less computationally demanding random kernel (RKS) algorithm also produced good results (validation RMSE = 22.22 W/m2). Comparison of results from sites with different ecosystem types showed the best results for evergreen, shrub, and grassland sites, and the weakest results for wetland sites. Generally, performance was not improved by training with data from only the same ecosystem type.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/321831
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 7.6
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 2.108
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCarter, Corinne-
dc.contributor.authorLiang, Shunlin-
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-03T02:21:45Z-
dc.date.available2022-11-03T02:21:45Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 2019, v. 78, p. 86-92-
dc.identifier.issn1569-8432-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/321831-
dc.description.abstractRemote sensing retrieval of evapotranspiration (ET), or surface latent heat exchange (LE), is of great utility for many applications. Machine learning (ML) methods have been extensively used in many disciplines, but so far little work has been performed systematically comparing ML methods for ET retrieval. This paper provides an evaluation of ten ML methods for estimating daily ET based on daily Global LAnd Surface Satellite (GLASS) radiation data and high-level Moderate-Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) data products and ground measured ET data from 184 flux tower sites. Measurements of accuracy (RMSE, R2, and bias) and run time were made for each of ten ML methods with a smaller training data set (n = 7910 data points) and a larger training data set (n= 69,752 data points). Inclusion of more input variables improved algorithm performance but had little effect on run time. The best results were obtained with the larger training data set using the bootstrap aggregation (bagging) regression tree (validation RMSE = 19.91 W/m2) and three hidden layer neural network (validation RMSE = 20.94 W/m2), although the less computationally demanding random kernel (RKS) algorithm also produced good results (validation RMSE = 22.22 W/m2). Comparison of results from sites with different ecosystem types showed the best results for evergreen, shrub, and grassland sites, and the weakest results for wetland sites. Generally, performance was not improved by training with data from only the same ecosystem type.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation-
dc.subjectAlbedo-
dc.subjectBootstrap aggregation tree-
dc.subjectComputational efficiency-
dc.subjectEvapotranspiration-
dc.subjectFlux tower-
dc.subjectFPAR-
dc.subjectGLASS-
dc.subjectLatent heat exchange-
dc.subjectLeaf area index-
dc.subjectMachine learning-
dc.subjectMODIS-
dc.subjectNadir adjusted reflectance-
dc.subjectNeural network-
dc.subjectRandom kernel-
dc.subjectRegression tree-
dc.subjectRegularized linear regression-
dc.subjectRemote sensing-
dc.subjectSurface energy balance-
dc.subjectSurface radiation-
dc.subjectVegetation index-
dc.titleEvaluation of ten machine learning methods for estimating terrestrial evapotranspiration from remote sensing-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jag.2019.01.020-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85061057888-
dc.identifier.volume78-
dc.identifier.spage86-
dc.identifier.epage92-
dc.identifier.eissn1872-826X-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000463131700008-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats