File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: L1 and L2 processing in the bilingual brain: A meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies

TitleL1 and L2 processing in the bilingual brain: A meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies
Authors
KeywordsAccommodation
Age of acquisition
Assimilation
Bilingualism
First/second language
Meta-analysis
Orthographic depth/transparency
Issue Date2016
Citation
Brain and Language, 2016, v. 159, p. 60-73 How to Cite?
AbstractNeuroimaging studies investigating bilingual processes have produced controversial results in determining similarities versus differences between L1 and L2 neural networks. The current meta-analytic study was conducted to examine what factors play a role in the similarities and differences between L1 and L2 networks with a focus on age of acquisition (AOA) and whether the orthographic transparency of L2 is more or less transparent than that of L1. Using activation likelihood estimation (ALE), we found L2 processing involved more additional regions than L1 for late bilinguals in comparison to early bilinguals, suggesting L2 processing is more demanding in late bilinguals. We also provide direct evidence that AOA of L2 influences L1 processing through the findings that early bilinguals had greater activation in the left fusiform gyrus than late bilinguals during L1 processing even when L1 languages were the same in the two groups, presumably due to greater co-activation of orthography in L1 and L2 in early bilinguals. In addition, we found that the same L2 languages evoked different brain activation patterns depending on whether it was more or less transparent than L1 in orthographic transparency. The bilateral auditory cortex and right precentral gyrus were more involved in shallower-than-L1 L2s, suggesting a "sound-out" strategy for a more regular language by involving the phonological regions and sensorimotor regions to a greater degree. In contrast, the left frontal cortex was more involved in the processing of deeper-than-L1 L2s, presumably due to the increased arbitrariness of mapping between orthography and phonology in L2.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/321684
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 2.1
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.881
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Hengshuang-
dc.contributor.authorCao, Fan-
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-03T02:20:44Z-
dc.date.available2022-11-03T02:20:44Z-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.citationBrain and Language, 2016, v. 159, p. 60-73-
dc.identifier.issn0093-934X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/321684-
dc.description.abstractNeuroimaging studies investigating bilingual processes have produced controversial results in determining similarities versus differences between L1 and L2 neural networks. The current meta-analytic study was conducted to examine what factors play a role in the similarities and differences between L1 and L2 networks with a focus on age of acquisition (AOA) and whether the orthographic transparency of L2 is more or less transparent than that of L1. Using activation likelihood estimation (ALE), we found L2 processing involved more additional regions than L1 for late bilinguals in comparison to early bilinguals, suggesting L2 processing is more demanding in late bilinguals. We also provide direct evidence that AOA of L2 influences L1 processing through the findings that early bilinguals had greater activation in the left fusiform gyrus than late bilinguals during L1 processing even when L1 languages were the same in the two groups, presumably due to greater co-activation of orthography in L1 and L2 in early bilinguals. In addition, we found that the same L2 languages evoked different brain activation patterns depending on whether it was more or less transparent than L1 in orthographic transparency. The bilateral auditory cortex and right precentral gyrus were more involved in shallower-than-L1 L2s, suggesting a "sound-out" strategy for a more regular language by involving the phonological regions and sensorimotor regions to a greater degree. In contrast, the left frontal cortex was more involved in the processing of deeper-than-L1 L2s, presumably due to the increased arbitrariness of mapping between orthography and phonology in L2.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofBrain and Language-
dc.subjectAccommodation-
dc.subjectAge of acquisition-
dc.subjectAssimilation-
dc.subjectBilingualism-
dc.subjectFirst/second language-
dc.subjectMeta-analysis-
dc.subjectOrthographic depth/transparency-
dc.titleL1 and L2 processing in the bilingual brain: A meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.bandl.2016.05.013-
dc.identifier.pmid27295606-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-84973572000-
dc.identifier.volume159-
dc.identifier.spage60-
dc.identifier.epage73-
dc.identifier.eissn1090-2155-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000381447400006-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats