File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Improving a Penman-Monteith evapotranspiration model by incorporating soil moisture control on soil evaporation in semiarid areas

TitleImproving a Penman-Monteith evapotranspiration model by incorporating soil moisture control on soil evaporation in semiarid areas
Authors
KeywordsET
MODIS
Penman-Monteith
soil moisture
Issue Date2013
Citation
International Journal of Digital Earth, 2013, v. 6, n. SUPPL1, p. 134-156 How to Cite?
AbstractPenman-Monteith (PM) theory has been successfully applied to calculate land surface evapotranspiration (ET) for regional and global scales. However, soil surface resistance, related to soil moisture, is always difficult to determine over a large region, especially in arid or semiarid areas. In this study, we developed an ET estimation algorithm by incorporating soil moisture control, a soil moisture index (SMI) derived from the surface temperature and vegetation index space. We denoted this ET algorithm as the PM-SMI. The PM-SMI algorithm was compared with several other algorithms that calculated soil evaporation using relative humidity, and validated with Bowen ratio measurements at seven sites in the Southern Great Plain (SGP) that were covered by grassland and cropland with low vegetation cover, as well as at three eddy covariance sites from AmeriFlux covered by forest with high vegetation cover. The results show that in comparison with the other methods examined, the PM-SMI algorithm significantly improved the daily ET estimates at SGP sites with a root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.91 mm/d, bias of 0.33 mm/d, and R2 of 0.77. For three forest sites, the PM-SMI ET estimates are closer to the ET measurements during the non-growing season when compared with the other three algorithms. At all the 10 validation sites, the PM-SMI algorithm performed the best. PM-SMI 8-day ET estimates were also compared with MODIS 8-day ET products (MOD16A2), and the latter showed negligible bias at SGP sites. In contrast, most of the PM-SMI 8-day ET estimates are around the 1:1 line. © 2013 © 2013 Taylor & Francis.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/321515
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 4.606
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.813
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSun, Liang-
dc.contributor.authorLiang, Shunlin-
dc.contributor.authorYuan, Wenping-
dc.contributor.authorChen, Zhongxin-
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-03T02:19:27Z-
dc.date.available2022-11-03T02:19:27Z-
dc.date.issued2013-
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Digital Earth, 2013, v. 6, n. SUPPL1, p. 134-156-
dc.identifier.issn1753-8947-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/321515-
dc.description.abstractPenman-Monteith (PM) theory has been successfully applied to calculate land surface evapotranspiration (ET) for regional and global scales. However, soil surface resistance, related to soil moisture, is always difficult to determine over a large region, especially in arid or semiarid areas. In this study, we developed an ET estimation algorithm by incorporating soil moisture control, a soil moisture index (SMI) derived from the surface temperature and vegetation index space. We denoted this ET algorithm as the PM-SMI. The PM-SMI algorithm was compared with several other algorithms that calculated soil evaporation using relative humidity, and validated with Bowen ratio measurements at seven sites in the Southern Great Plain (SGP) that were covered by grassland and cropland with low vegetation cover, as well as at three eddy covariance sites from AmeriFlux covered by forest with high vegetation cover. The results show that in comparison with the other methods examined, the PM-SMI algorithm significantly improved the daily ET estimates at SGP sites with a root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.91 mm/d, bias of 0.33 mm/d, and R2 of 0.77. For three forest sites, the PM-SMI ET estimates are closer to the ET measurements during the non-growing season when compared with the other three algorithms. At all the 10 validation sites, the PM-SMI algorithm performed the best. PM-SMI 8-day ET estimates were also compared with MODIS 8-day ET products (MOD16A2), and the latter showed negligible bias at SGP sites. In contrast, most of the PM-SMI 8-day ET estimates are around the 1:1 line. © 2013 © 2013 Taylor & Francis.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Digital Earth-
dc.subjectET-
dc.subjectMODIS-
dc.subjectPenman-Monteith-
dc.subjectsoil moisture-
dc.titleImproving a Penman-Monteith evapotranspiration model by incorporating soil moisture control on soil evaporation in semiarid areas-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/17538947.2013.783635-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-84878856826-
dc.identifier.volume6-
dc.identifier.issueSUPPL1-
dc.identifier.spage134-
dc.identifier.epage156-
dc.identifier.eissn1753-8955-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000328243700008-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats