Simultaneous determination of aerosol optical thickness and surface reflectance using ASTER visible to near-infrared data over land

Abstract

An innovative method for the determination of aerosol optical thickness (AOT) and surface reflectance for operational use of Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer (ASTER) visible to near-infrared data is presented. This method is designed to obtain the atmospheric parameters needed in the correction of the image. This method is based on a simplified radiative transfer equation describing the relation between the ground surface reflectance, AOT and top-of-atmosphere reflectance. By exploiting the ASTER dual-angle view capabilities in band 3N (Nadir) and band 3B (Backwards), surface reflectance and AOT can be retrieved synchronously. Thus, it solves the problem of separating atmospheric radiance from the transmitted radiance of the surface to some extent. After applying this new atmospheric correction method to three areas of ASTER images, Beijing urban city, the Heihe River Basin and Hong Kong of China, ASTER surface reflectance products (AST07) were obtained. AOT values from in situ measurements of CIMEL Electronique 318 Sun Photometers or AERONET (AErosol RObotic NETwork) and surface reflectance in situ measured using an Analytical Spectral Device (ASD) Field Spec spectral radiometer are used for validation. AOT derived from the new method is consistent with in situ station measurements from CIMEL Electronique 318 Sun Photometer and level 2.0 data from AERONET, with correlation coefficient (R2) of 0.98 and root mean square error of 0.05, whereas Multi-angle Imaging Spectroradiometer AOT products underestimate AERONET AOT and Moderate-Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer AOT products overestimate AERONET AOT in these regions. More encouraging is the comparison between the corrected surface reflectance, AST07 and ASD measurements. Root mean square error of AST07 and retrieved surface reflectance are as follows: band 1 (556 nm) = 0.04 and 0.05; band 2 (661 nm) = 0.036 and 0.035; band 3 (807 nm) = 0.056 and 0.038, which suggests that compared with AST07 in bands 2 and 3, retrieved surface reflectance has better agreement with measured reflectance from ASD. © 2011 Taylor & Francis.