File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Regression-Based Strategies to Reduce Refractive Error-Associated Glaucoma Diagnostic Bias When Using OCT and OCT Angiography

TitleRegression-Based Strategies to Reduce Refractive Error-Associated Glaucoma Diagnostic Bias When Using OCT and OCT Angiography
Authors
Issue Date2022
Citation
Translational Vision Science & Technology, 2022, v. 11, p. 8 How to Cite?
AbstractPurpose: The purpose of this study was to correct refractive error-associated bias in optical coherence tomography (OCT) and OCT angiography (OCTA) glaucoma diagnostic parameters. Methods: OCT and OCTA imaging were obtained from participants in the Hong Kong FAMILY cohort. The Avanti/AngioVue OCT/OCTA system was used to measure the peripapillary nerve fiber layer thickness (NFLT), peripapillary nerve fiber layer plexus capillary density (NFLP-CD), macular ganglion cell complex thickness (GCCT), and macular superficial vascular complex vascular density (SVC-VD). Healthy eyes, including ones with axial ametropia, were enrolled for analysis. Results: A total of 1346 eyes from 792 participants were divided into 4 subgroups: high myopia (<-6D), low myopia (-6D to -1D), emmetropia (-1D to 1D), and hyperopia (>1D). After accounting for age, sex, and signal strength, multivariable regression showed strong dependence in most models for NFLT, GCCT, and NFLP-CD on axial eye length (AL), spherical equivalent (SE) refraction, and apparent optic disc diameter (DD). Optical analysis indicated that AL-related transverse optical magnification variations predominated over anatomic variations and were responsible for these trends. Compared to the emmetropic group, the false positive rates were significantly (Chi-square test P < 0.003) elevated in both myopia groups for NFLT, NFLP-CD, and GCCT. Regression-based adjustment of these diagnostic parameters with AL or SE significantly (McNemar test P < 0.03) reduced the elevated false positive rates. Conclusions: Myopic eyes are biased to have lower NFLT, GCCT, and NFLP-CD measurements. AL- and SE-based adjustments were effective in mitigating this bias. Translational relevance: Adoption of these adjustments into commercial OCT systems may reduce false positive rates related to refractive error.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/317697
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLiu, K-
dc.contributor.authorTan, O-
dc.contributor.authorYou, QS-
dc.contributor.authorChen, A-
dc.contributor.authorChan, JCH-
dc.contributor.authorChoy, NKB-
dc.contributor.authorShih, KC-
dc.contributor.authorWong, KWJ-
dc.contributor.authorNg, LKA-
dc.contributor.authorCheung, JJC-
dc.contributor.authorNi, MY-
dc.contributor.authorLai, JSM-
dc.contributor.authorLeung, GM-
dc.contributor.authorLiu, L-
dc.contributor.authorHuang, D-
dc.contributor.authorWong, YHI-
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-07T10:25:16Z-
dc.date.available2022-10-07T10:25:16Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.citationTranslational Vision Science & Technology, 2022, v. 11, p. 8-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/317697-
dc.description.abstractPurpose: The purpose of this study was to correct refractive error-associated bias in optical coherence tomography (OCT) and OCT angiography (OCTA) glaucoma diagnostic parameters. Methods: OCT and OCTA imaging were obtained from participants in the Hong Kong FAMILY cohort. The Avanti/AngioVue OCT/OCTA system was used to measure the peripapillary nerve fiber layer thickness (NFLT), peripapillary nerve fiber layer plexus capillary density (NFLP-CD), macular ganglion cell complex thickness (GCCT), and macular superficial vascular complex vascular density (SVC-VD). Healthy eyes, including ones with axial ametropia, were enrolled for analysis. Results: A total of 1346 eyes from 792 participants were divided into 4 subgroups: high myopia (<-6D), low myopia (-6D to -1D), emmetropia (-1D to 1D), and hyperopia (>1D). After accounting for age, sex, and signal strength, multivariable regression showed strong dependence in most models for NFLT, GCCT, and NFLP-CD on axial eye length (AL), spherical equivalent (SE) refraction, and apparent optic disc diameter (DD). Optical analysis indicated that AL-related transverse optical magnification variations predominated over anatomic variations and were responsible for these trends. Compared to the emmetropic group, the false positive rates were significantly (Chi-square test P < 0.003) elevated in both myopia groups for NFLT, NFLP-CD, and GCCT. Regression-based adjustment of these diagnostic parameters with AL or SE significantly (McNemar test P < 0.03) reduced the elevated false positive rates. Conclusions: Myopic eyes are biased to have lower NFLT, GCCT, and NFLP-CD measurements. AL- and SE-based adjustments were effective in mitigating this bias. Translational relevance: Adoption of these adjustments into commercial OCT systems may reduce false positive rates related to refractive error.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofTranslational Vision Science & Technology-
dc.titleRegression-Based Strategies to Reduce Refractive Error-Associated Glaucoma Diagnostic Bias When Using OCT and OCT Angiography-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailChan, JCH: jonochan@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailChoy, NKB: bnkchoy@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailShih, KC: kcshih@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailNi, MY: nimy@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityChan, JCH=rp02113-
dc.identifier.authorityChoy, NKB=rp01795-
dc.identifier.authorityShih, KC=rp01374-
dc.identifier.authorityWong, KWJ=rp02294-
dc.identifier.authorityNg, LKA=rp01842-
dc.identifier.authorityCheung, JJC=rp02219-
dc.identifier.authorityNi, MY=rp01639-
dc.identifier.authorityLai, JSM=rp00295-
dc.identifier.authorityLeung, GM=rp00460-
dc.identifier.authorityWong, YHI=rp01467-
dc.identifier.doi10.1167/tvst.11.9.8-
dc.identifier.hkuros337009-
dc.identifier.volume11-
dc.identifier.spage8-
dc.identifier.epage8-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:001000714300032-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats