File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Conference Paper: Follow-up visits after breast cancer: finding the optimal frequency

TitleFollow-up visits after breast cancer: finding the optimal frequency
Authors
Issue Date2022
PublisherWiley-Blackwell Publishing Asia. The Journal's web site is located at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1744-1633
Citation
The Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh & The College of Surgeons of Hong Kong Conjoint Scientific Congress, Hong Kong, China, 17 September 2022, v. 26 n. Suppl.1, p. 10 How to Cite?
AbstractAim:Numerous international organizations have provided guidelinesfor clinical follow-up after breast cancer treatment during the first5 years, ranging from 3 to 6 months with reduced frequency or visitsafter this. In most guidelines, annual mammography is also recom-mended. In the face of a global pandemic and rise of telemedicine,COVID-19 has forced us to re-examine the efficacy of existing guide-lines for in-person follow-up practices.Methods:Between 2010 to 2020, 3264 patients with early andadvanced stage breast cancer treated by breast conserving surgery(BCS) or mastectomy with recorded relapses by December 2021 wasanalyzed. Mode of detection of the relapse was noted.Results:A total of 100 relapses was identified. Twenty-eight ofthese patients relapsed concurrently with metastatic disease. Locore-gional relapse rate in this series was 2.2%. Forty-nine relapsesoccurred in the ipsilateral breast or chest wall. Fifteen were in the ipsi-lateral axilla and eight relapses occurred in the both the ipsilateralbreast and axilla. Forty-three relapses (43%) were symptomatic,twenty (20%) were detected clinically, thirty (30%) were detected bysurveillance mammography, one patient (1%) presented with elevatedtumor markers and six (6%) others presented on scheduled CT orPETCT scans. The average time interval between relapse and lastmammogram was 16.7 months.Conclusion:Routine scheduled in-person assessment still has animportant role in the detection of relapses of breast cancer. However,the importance of self-awareness and self-examination should beemphasized and ideally, with a system for early return to the clinic ifabnormality is suspected.10EXTRA FREE PAPER
DescriptionEFP6 (Oral Presentation)
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/317129
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 0.3
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.152

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMak, CKJ-
dc.contributor.authorKwong, A-
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-30T09:05:44Z-
dc.date.available2022-09-30T09:05:44Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.citationThe Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh & The College of Surgeons of Hong Kong Conjoint Scientific Congress, Hong Kong, China, 17 September 2022, v. 26 n. Suppl.1, p. 10-
dc.identifier.issn1744-1625-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/317129-
dc.descriptionEFP6 (Oral Presentation)-
dc.description.abstractAim:Numerous international organizations have provided guidelinesfor clinical follow-up after breast cancer treatment during the first5 years, ranging from 3 to 6 months with reduced frequency or visitsafter this. In most guidelines, annual mammography is also recom-mended. In the face of a global pandemic and rise of telemedicine,COVID-19 has forced us to re-examine the efficacy of existing guide-lines for in-person follow-up practices.Methods:Between 2010 to 2020, 3264 patients with early andadvanced stage breast cancer treated by breast conserving surgery(BCS) or mastectomy with recorded relapses by December 2021 wasanalyzed. Mode of detection of the relapse was noted.Results:A total of 100 relapses was identified. Twenty-eight ofthese patients relapsed concurrently with metastatic disease. Locore-gional relapse rate in this series was 2.2%. Forty-nine relapsesoccurred in the ipsilateral breast or chest wall. Fifteen were in the ipsi-lateral axilla and eight relapses occurred in the both the ipsilateralbreast and axilla. Forty-three relapses (43%) were symptomatic,twenty (20%) were detected clinically, thirty (30%) were detected bysurveillance mammography, one patient (1%) presented with elevatedtumor markers and six (6%) others presented on scheduled CT orPETCT scans. The average time interval between relapse and lastmammogram was 16.7 months.Conclusion:Routine scheduled in-person assessment still has animportant role in the detection of relapses of breast cancer. However,the importance of self-awareness and self-examination should beemphasized and ideally, with a system for early return to the clinic ifabnormality is suspected.10EXTRA FREE PAPER-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell Publishing Asia. The Journal's web site is located at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1744-1633-
dc.relation.ispartofSurgical Practice-
dc.rightsSubmitted (preprint) Version This is the pre-peer reviewed version of the following article: [FULL CITE], which has been published in final form at [Link to final article using the DOI]. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self-Archived Versions. Accepted (peer-reviewed) Version This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: [FULL CITE], which has been published in final form at [Link to final article using the DOI]. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self-Archived Versions.-
dc.titleFollow-up visits after breast cancer: finding the optimal frequency-
dc.typeConference_Paper-
dc.identifier.emailKwong, A: avakwong@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityKwong, A=rp01734-
dc.description.natureabstract-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/1744-1633.12601-
dc.identifier.hkuros337026-
dc.identifier.volume26-
dc.identifier.issueSuppl.1-
dc.identifier.spage10-
dc.identifier.epage10-
dc.publisher.placeAustralia-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats