File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1038/s41598-020-70980-5
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85090006235
- PMID: 32868791
- WOS: WOS:000570035500081
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Robust design from systems physics
Title | Robust design from systems physics |
---|---|
Authors | |
Issue Date | 2020 |
Citation | Scientific Reports, 2020, v. 10, n. 1, article no. 14334 How to Cite? |
Abstract | A crucial challenge in engineering modern, integrated systems is to produce robust designs. However, quantifying the robustness of a design is less straightforward than quantifying the robustness of products. For products, in particular engineering materials, intuitive, plain language terms of strong versus weak and brittle versus ductile take on precise, quantitative meaning in terms of stress–strain relationships. Here, we show that a “systems physics” framing of integrated system design produces stress–strain relationships in design space. From these stress–strain relationships, we find that both the mathematical and intuitive notions of strong versus weak and brittle versus directly characterize the robustness of designs. We use this to show that the relative robustness of designs against changes in problem objectives has a simple graphical representation. This graphical representation, and its underlying stress–strain foundation, provide new metrics that can be applied to classes of designs to assess robustness from feature- to system-level. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/317089 |
ISI Accession Number ID | |
Errata |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Klishin, Andrei A. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kirkley, Alec | - |
dc.contributor.author | Singer, David J. | - |
dc.contributor.author | van Anders, Greg | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-09-19T06:18:46Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2022-09-19T06:18:46Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Scientific Reports, 2020, v. 10, n. 1, article no. 14334 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/317089 | - |
dc.description.abstract | A crucial challenge in engineering modern, integrated systems is to produce robust designs. However, quantifying the robustness of a design is less straightforward than quantifying the robustness of products. For products, in particular engineering materials, intuitive, plain language terms of strong versus weak and brittle versus ductile take on precise, quantitative meaning in terms of stress–strain relationships. Here, we show that a “systems physics” framing of integrated system design produces stress–strain relationships in design space. From these stress–strain relationships, we find that both the mathematical and intuitive notions of strong versus weak and brittle versus directly characterize the robustness of designs. We use this to show that the relative robustness of designs against changes in problem objectives has a simple graphical representation. This graphical representation, and its underlying stress–strain foundation, provide new metrics that can be applied to classes of designs to assess robustness from feature- to system-level. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Scientific Reports | - |
dc.title | Robust design from systems physics | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1038/s41598-020-70980-5 | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 32868791 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85090006235 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 10 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 1 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | article no. 14334 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | article no. 14334 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 2045-2322 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000570035500081 | - |
dc.relation.erratum | doi:10.1038/s41598-020-75648-8 | - |
dc.relation.erratum | eid:eid_2-s2.0-85094679082 | - |