File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

Supplementary

Conference Paper: Computational simulation of a novel surgical screw guide system to determine the optimal trajectory for S2-alar-iliac screw fixation in minimally invasive pelvic and spine surgery

TitleComputational simulation of a novel surgical screw guide system to determine the optimal trajectory for S2-alar-iliac screw fixation in minimally invasive pelvic and spine surgery
Authors
Issue Date2021
PublisherHong Kong Orthopaedic Association..
Citation
41st Annual Congress of the Hong Kong Orthopaedic Association (HKOA), Hong Kong, China, 6-7 November 2021 How to Cite?
AbstractIntroduction: The ideal trajectory for S2-alar-iliac (S2AI) screw insertion remains difficult to determine intraoperatively. Using a novel surgical guide which references the greater sciatic notch and outer pelvic surface, in conjunction with computational simulation, we identified a point through which an S2AI screw may be passed that optimises screw length, while minimising perforation hazards. Methodology: Computed tomography scans of 87 adult hemipelvises were segmented and imported for 3D manipulation. A simulated array of screws was passed from the sacral entry point through nine target points with distances from the greater sciatic notch (Y) and outer pelvic surface (X) varying in 1-cm intervals. At each point, the maximum allowable screw length and incidence of critical perforations of the hip joint and inner pelvic cortex were recorded. Results: Target points (X,Y) = (1,1) (1,2) and (2,1) allowed for the longest screw lengths, with mean 104.5 mm (95% CI=101.1107.9) vs 101.84 mm (95% CI=97.7-106) vs 105.71 mm (95% CI=99.4-112.1). (1,1) has significantly lower risk for complete inner cortex perforation versus (1,2) and (2,1), 1% vs 8% vs 31% (p<0.001) and partial inner cortex perforation, 2% vs 8% vs 28% (p<0.001). However (1,1) has higher risk of hip perforation than (1,2) 18% vs 2% (p<0.001). Conclusion: We determined that target point (1,1) is optimal for S2AI screw insertion. The surgeon should use fluoroscopy to monitor for potential hip perforation.
DescriptionFree Paper Session V: Trauma, FP5.24
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/316793

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFang, CX-
dc.contributor.authorCheung, L-
dc.contributor.authorFang, EJHH-
dc.contributor.authorKwan, KYH-
dc.contributor.authorLau, F-
dc.contributor.authorLeung, MF-
dc.contributor.authorCheung, KMC-
dc.contributor.authorLeung, FKL-
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-16T07:23:29Z-
dc.date.available2022-09-16T07:23:29Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.citation41st Annual Congress of the Hong Kong Orthopaedic Association (HKOA), Hong Kong, China, 6-7 November 2021-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/316793-
dc.descriptionFree Paper Session V: Trauma, FP5.24-
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: The ideal trajectory for S2-alar-iliac (S2AI) screw insertion remains difficult to determine intraoperatively. Using a novel surgical guide which references the greater sciatic notch and outer pelvic surface, in conjunction with computational simulation, we identified a point through which an S2AI screw may be passed that optimises screw length, while minimising perforation hazards. Methodology: Computed tomography scans of 87 adult hemipelvises were segmented and imported for 3D manipulation. A simulated array of screws was passed from the sacral entry point through nine target points with distances from the greater sciatic notch (Y) and outer pelvic surface (X) varying in 1-cm intervals. At each point, the maximum allowable screw length and incidence of critical perforations of the hip joint and inner pelvic cortex were recorded. Results: Target points (X,Y) = (1,1) (1,2) and (2,1) allowed for the longest screw lengths, with mean 104.5 mm (95% CI=101.1107.9) vs 101.84 mm (95% CI=97.7-106) vs 105.71 mm (95% CI=99.4-112.1). (1,1) has significantly lower risk for complete inner cortex perforation versus (1,2) and (2,1), 1% vs 8% vs 31% (p<0.001) and partial inner cortex perforation, 2% vs 8% vs 28% (p<0.001). However (1,1) has higher risk of hip perforation than (1,2) 18% vs 2% (p<0.001). Conclusion: We determined that target point (1,1) is optimal for S2AI screw insertion. The surgeon should use fluoroscopy to monitor for potential hip perforation.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherHong Kong Orthopaedic Association..-
dc.titleComputational simulation of a novel surgical screw guide system to determine the optimal trajectory for S2-alar-iliac screw fixation in minimally invasive pelvic and spine surgery-
dc.typeConference_Paper-
dc.identifier.emailFang, CX: cfang@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailKwan, KYH: kyhkwan@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailLeung, MF: manfai@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailCheung, KMC: cheungmc@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailLeung, FKL: klleunga@hkucc.hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityFang, CX=rp02016-
dc.identifier.authorityKwan, KYH=rp02014-
dc.identifier.authorityCheung, KMC=rp00387-
dc.identifier.authorityLeung, FKL=rp00297-
dc.identifier.hkuros336631-
dc.publisher.placeChina-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats