File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Lower extremity functional electrical stimulation cycling promotes physical and functional recovery in chronic spinal cord injury

TitleLower extremity functional electrical stimulation cycling promotes physical and functional recovery in chronic spinal cord injury
Authors
KeywordsActivity-based restorative therapy
Assistive technology
Cycle ergometry
Functional electrical stimulation
Paraplegia
Physical muscle strength
Quality of life
Rehabilitation
Spasticity
Spinal cord injury
Tetraplegia
Issue Date2013
Citation
Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine, 2013, v. 36, n. 6, p. 623-631 How to Cite?
AbstractObjective: To examine the effect of long-termlower extremity functional electrical stimulation (FES) cycling on the physical integrity and functional recovery in people with chronic spinal cord injury (SCI). Design: Retrospective cohort, mean follow-up 29.1 months, and cross-sectional evaluation. Setting: Washington University Spinal Cord Injury Neurorehabilitation Center, referral center. Participants: Twenty-five people with chronic SCI who received FES during cycling were matched by age, gender, injury level, and severity, and duration of injury to 20 people with SCI who received range of motion and stretching. Intervention: Lower extremity FES during cycling as part of an activity-based restorative treatment regimen. Main outcome measure: Change in neurological function: motor, sensory, and combined motor-sensory scores (CMSS) assessed by the American Spinal Injury Association Impairment scale. Response was defined as ≥1 point improvement. Results: FES was associated with an 80% CMSS responder rate compared to 40% in controls. An average 9.6 CMSS point loss among controls was offset by an average 20-point gain among FES subjects. Quadriceps muscle mass was on average 36% higher and intra/inter-muscular fat 44% lower, in the FES group. Hamstring and quadriceps muscle strength was 30 and 35% greater, respectively, in the FES group. Quality of life and daily function measures were significantly higher in FES group. Conclusion: FES during cycling in chronic SCI may provide substantial physical integrity benefits, including enhanced neurological and functional performance, increased muscle size and force-generation potential, reduced spasticity, and improved quality of life. © The Academy of Spinal Cord Injury Professionals, Inc. 2013.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/316085
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 1.8
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.534
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSadowsky, Cristina L.-
dc.contributor.authorHammond, Edward R.-
dc.contributor.authorStrohl, Adam B.-
dc.contributor.authorCommean, Paul K.-
dc.contributor.authorEby, Sarah A.-
dc.contributor.authorDamiano, Diane L.-
dc.contributor.authorWingert, Jason R.-
dc.contributor.authorBae, Kyongtae T.-
dc.contributor.authorMcDonald, John W.-
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-24T15:49:11Z-
dc.date.available2022-08-24T15:49:11Z-
dc.date.issued2013-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Spinal Cord Medicine, 2013, v. 36, n. 6, p. 623-631-
dc.identifier.issn1079-0268-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/316085-
dc.description.abstractObjective: To examine the effect of long-termlower extremity functional electrical stimulation (FES) cycling on the physical integrity and functional recovery in people with chronic spinal cord injury (SCI). Design: Retrospective cohort, mean follow-up 29.1 months, and cross-sectional evaluation. Setting: Washington University Spinal Cord Injury Neurorehabilitation Center, referral center. Participants: Twenty-five people with chronic SCI who received FES during cycling were matched by age, gender, injury level, and severity, and duration of injury to 20 people with SCI who received range of motion and stretching. Intervention: Lower extremity FES during cycling as part of an activity-based restorative treatment regimen. Main outcome measure: Change in neurological function: motor, sensory, and combined motor-sensory scores (CMSS) assessed by the American Spinal Injury Association Impairment scale. Response was defined as ≥1 point improvement. Results: FES was associated with an 80% CMSS responder rate compared to 40% in controls. An average 9.6 CMSS point loss among controls was offset by an average 20-point gain among FES subjects. Quadriceps muscle mass was on average 36% higher and intra/inter-muscular fat 44% lower, in the FES group. Hamstring and quadriceps muscle strength was 30 and 35% greater, respectively, in the FES group. Quality of life and daily function measures were significantly higher in FES group. Conclusion: FES during cycling in chronic SCI may provide substantial physical integrity benefits, including enhanced neurological and functional performance, increased muscle size and force-generation potential, reduced spasticity, and improved quality of life. © The Academy of Spinal Cord Injury Professionals, Inc. 2013.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Spinal Cord Medicine-
dc.subjectActivity-based restorative therapy-
dc.subjectAssistive technology-
dc.subjectCycle ergometry-
dc.subjectFunctional electrical stimulation-
dc.subjectParaplegia-
dc.subjectPhysical muscle strength-
dc.subjectQuality of life-
dc.subjectRehabilitation-
dc.subjectSpasticity-
dc.subjectSpinal cord injury-
dc.subjectTetraplegia-
dc.titleLower extremity functional electrical stimulation cycling promotes physical and functional recovery in chronic spinal cord injury-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1179/2045772313Y.0000000101-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-84890483472-
dc.identifier.volume36-
dc.identifier.issue6-
dc.identifier.spage623-
dc.identifier.epage631-
dc.identifier.eissn2045-7723-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000327871900007-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats