File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: CT of the pancreas: Comparison of anatomic structure depiction, image quality, and radiation exposure between 320-detector volumetric images and 64-detector helical images

TitleCT of the pancreas: Comparison of anatomic structure depiction, image quality, and radiation exposure between 320-detector volumetric images and 64-detector helical images
Authors
Issue Date2011
Citation
Radiology, 2011, v. 260, n. 1, p. 139-147 How to Cite?
AbstractPurpose: To prospectively compare 320-detector volumetric and 64-detector helical computed tomographic (CT) images of the pancreas for depiction of anatomic structures, image noise, and radiation exposure. Materials and Methods: This study was approved by the institutional review board, and written informed consent was obtained. A total of 154 patients (85 men, 69 women; age range, 26-85 years; mean age, 67 years) who underwent biphasic (arterial and pancreatic phase) contrast material - enhanced CT performed with a 320-detector scanner were randomized into two groups: the 320-detector group and the 64-detector group. Biphasic transaxial multiplanar reformatted images and volume-rendered CT angiograms were obtained. CT numbers in the abdominal aorta, pancreas, and abdominal wall fat tissue; signal-to-noise ratio (SNR); and dose-length product (DLP) were compared. In addition, image quality and focal lesion depiction(n = 35) were qualitatively determined in the two groups. Unpaired t and Mann-Whitney tests were used for quantitative and qualitative assessment, respectively. Results: No significant difference in CT numbers of the abdominal aorta and pancreas was noted between the two groups. Mean DLP was 43% lower in the 320-detector group (675.4 mGy•cm) than in the 64-detector group (1187.8 mGy•cm) (P < .001). SNR of the abdominal aorta, pancreas, and abdominal wall fat on biphasic images was significantly lower in the 320-detector group than in the 64-detector group (P < .001). Image quality was acceptable in both groups and was slightly better in the 64-detector group for pancreatic phase axial images (P = .02) and arterial phase multiplanar reformatted images (P < .01). No significant difference was found in the depiction of pancreatic parenchyma, main pancreatic duct, focal pancreatic lesions, splanchnic arteries, or most of the small splanchnic arterial branches. Conclusion: A 320-detector CT scan facilitates fast volumetric contrast-enhanced CT of the entire pancreas with acceptable image quality, even though SNR was significantly lower at 320-detector volumetric scanning. © RSNA, 2011.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/316052
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 12.1
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 3.692
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGoshima, Satoshi-
dc.contributor.authorKanematsu, Masayuki-
dc.contributor.authorNishibori, Hironori-
dc.contributor.authorSakurai, Kota-
dc.contributor.authorMiyazawa, Daisuke-
dc.contributor.authorWatanabe, Haruo-
dc.contributor.authorKondo, Hiroshi-
dc.contributor.authorShiratori, Yoshimune-
dc.contributor.authorOnozuka, Minoru-
dc.contributor.authorMoriyama, Noriyuki-
dc.contributor.authorBae, Kyongtae T.-
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-24T15:49:04Z-
dc.date.available2022-08-24T15:49:04Z-
dc.date.issued2011-
dc.identifier.citationRadiology, 2011, v. 260, n. 1, p. 139-147-
dc.identifier.issn0033-8419-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/316052-
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To prospectively compare 320-detector volumetric and 64-detector helical computed tomographic (CT) images of the pancreas for depiction of anatomic structures, image noise, and radiation exposure. Materials and Methods: This study was approved by the institutional review board, and written informed consent was obtained. A total of 154 patients (85 men, 69 women; age range, 26-85 years; mean age, 67 years) who underwent biphasic (arterial and pancreatic phase) contrast material - enhanced CT performed with a 320-detector scanner were randomized into two groups: the 320-detector group and the 64-detector group. Biphasic transaxial multiplanar reformatted images and volume-rendered CT angiograms were obtained. CT numbers in the abdominal aorta, pancreas, and abdominal wall fat tissue; signal-to-noise ratio (SNR); and dose-length product (DLP) were compared. In addition, image quality and focal lesion depiction(n = 35) were qualitatively determined in the two groups. Unpaired t and Mann-Whitney tests were used for quantitative and qualitative assessment, respectively. Results: No significant difference in CT numbers of the abdominal aorta and pancreas was noted between the two groups. Mean DLP was 43% lower in the 320-detector group (675.4 mGy•cm) than in the 64-detector group (1187.8 mGy•cm) (P < .001). SNR of the abdominal aorta, pancreas, and abdominal wall fat on biphasic images was significantly lower in the 320-detector group than in the 64-detector group (P < .001). Image quality was acceptable in both groups and was slightly better in the 64-detector group for pancreatic phase axial images (P = .02) and arterial phase multiplanar reformatted images (P < .01). No significant difference was found in the depiction of pancreatic parenchyma, main pancreatic duct, focal pancreatic lesions, splanchnic arteries, or most of the small splanchnic arterial branches. Conclusion: A 320-detector CT scan facilitates fast volumetric contrast-enhanced CT of the entire pancreas with acceptable image quality, even though SNR was significantly lower at 320-detector volumetric scanning. © RSNA, 2011.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofRadiology-
dc.titleCT of the pancreas: Comparison of anatomic structure depiction, image quality, and radiation exposure between 320-detector volumetric images and 64-detector helical images-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1148/radiol.11101459-
dc.identifier.pmid21406629-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-79959559275-
dc.identifier.volume260-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.spage139-
dc.identifier.epage147-
dc.identifier.eissn1527-1315-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000291932300016-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats