File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Accuracy and reproducibility of blood clot burden quantification with pulmonary CT angiography

TitleAccuracy and reproducibility of blood clot burden quantification with pulmonary CT angiography
Authors
KeywordsClot burden
CT angiography
Pulmonary angiography
Pulmonary embolism
Issue Date2011
Citation
American Journal of Roentgenology, 2011, v. 196, n. 3, p. 516-523 How to Cite?
AbstractOBJECTIVE. The purpose of our study was to assess the accuracy and reproducibility of clot burden quantification with pulmonary CT angiography (CTA). MATERIALS AND METHODS. A semiautomated program was developed for segmentation and volumetric quantification of pulmonary embolus with pulmonary CTA. The accuracy of this measurement method was assessed using two pulmonary embolus phantoms. Reproducibility of the measurement method was assessed using clinical pulmonary CTA in 30 patients (16 women, 14 men; mean age, 62 years) with pulmonary embolism (PE). Two observers segmented and measured the volume of blood clot from pulmonary CTA images twice at two separate sessions. Accuracy was evaluated by the relative volume measurement error. Intra- and interobserver reliability were evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC); agreement between measurements within and between the two observers was assessed using Bland-Altman analysis. RESULTS. Mean relative measurement error from the two phantoms was less than 1% for both observers. A total of 60 emboli were measured from the 30 patients. The intraobserver ICC was 0.990 for observer 1 and 0.999 for observer 2; interobserver ICC was 0.994 for session 1 and 0.989 for session 2. ICC for all four clot measurements was 0.988. Mean volume measurement difference for intraobserver agreement was 0.9% for observer 1 and 0.3% for observer 2, and interobserver agreement was -5.1% for session 1 and -5.8% for session 2. CONCLUSION. Blood clot burden can be quantified with a high degree of accuracy and reproducibility from pulmonary CTA images using a semiautomated segmentation method. © American Roentgen Ray Society.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/316047
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 4.7
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.235
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFurlan, Alessandro-
dc.contributor.authorPatil, Amol-
dc.contributor.authorPark, Bumwoo-
dc.contributor.authorChang, Chung Chou H.-
dc.contributor.authorRoberts, Mark S.-
dc.contributor.authorBae, Kyongtae T.-
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-24T15:49:04Z-
dc.date.available2022-08-24T15:49:04Z-
dc.date.issued2011-
dc.identifier.citationAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 2011, v. 196, n. 3, p. 516-523-
dc.identifier.issn0361-803X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/316047-
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE. The purpose of our study was to assess the accuracy and reproducibility of clot burden quantification with pulmonary CT angiography (CTA). MATERIALS AND METHODS. A semiautomated program was developed for segmentation and volumetric quantification of pulmonary embolus with pulmonary CTA. The accuracy of this measurement method was assessed using two pulmonary embolus phantoms. Reproducibility of the measurement method was assessed using clinical pulmonary CTA in 30 patients (16 women, 14 men; mean age, 62 years) with pulmonary embolism (PE). Two observers segmented and measured the volume of blood clot from pulmonary CTA images twice at two separate sessions. Accuracy was evaluated by the relative volume measurement error. Intra- and interobserver reliability were evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC); agreement between measurements within and between the two observers was assessed using Bland-Altman analysis. RESULTS. Mean relative measurement error from the two phantoms was less than 1% for both observers. A total of 60 emboli were measured from the 30 patients. The intraobserver ICC was 0.990 for observer 1 and 0.999 for observer 2; interobserver ICC was 0.994 for session 1 and 0.989 for session 2. ICC for all four clot measurements was 0.988. Mean volume measurement difference for intraobserver agreement was 0.9% for observer 1 and 0.3% for observer 2, and interobserver agreement was -5.1% for session 1 and -5.8% for session 2. CONCLUSION. Blood clot burden can be quantified with a high degree of accuracy and reproducibility from pulmonary CTA images using a semiautomated segmentation method. © American Roentgen Ray Society.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofAmerican Journal of Roentgenology-
dc.subjectClot burden-
dc.subjectCT angiography-
dc.subjectPulmonary angiography-
dc.subjectPulmonary embolism-
dc.titleAccuracy and reproducibility of blood clot burden quantification with pulmonary CT angiography-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.2214/AJR.10.4603-
dc.identifier.pmid21343492-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-79952260546-
dc.identifier.volume196-
dc.identifier.issue3-
dc.identifier.spage516-
dc.identifier.epage523-
dc.identifier.eissn1546-3141-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000287585100026-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats