File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1016/j.desal.2021.115505
- WOS: WOS:000782123600004
- Find via
Supplementary
-
Citations:
- Web of Science: 0
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Effects of crossflow filtration cell configuration on membrane separation performance and fouling behaviour
Title | Effects of crossflow filtration cell configuration on membrane separation performance and fouling behaviour |
---|---|
Authors | |
Issue Date | 2022 |
Citation | Desalination, 2022, v. 525, p. 115505 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Configurations of crossflow filtration cells are important to determine membrane separation performance in laboratory studies. We systematically investigated the effects of crossflow filtration cell designs, including sealing approaches and back support configurations, on the determination of membrane water flux, salts rejection, and fouling behaviour. In particular, the definition of effective filtration area in the O-ring sealed cell could lead to an overestimated (defined as flow channel area) or underestimated (defined as O-ring enclosed area) membrane water flux compared to the benchmark data acquired from a silicone gasket sealed cell. In addition, it was found that the highly porous back support could yield higher water flux and salt rejection as well as better antifouling performance than that of the perforated plate support. The porous back support could significantly reduce the total resistance to water permeation thanks to the minimized average path length and increased hydraulic conductance for water transport. Moreover, the porous back support enabled better control of concentration polarization as it avoided local flux ‘hot spots’ that would occur above local perforations, and thus benefits membrane rejections. These findings provide important insights into the design of crossflow filtration cells for a more reliable and representative determination of membrane separation performance. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/314689 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 8.3 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.521 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Zhang, J | - |
dc.contributor.author | Huang, S | - |
dc.contributor.author | Guo, H | - |
dc.contributor.author | Fane, AG | - |
dc.contributor.author | Tang, C | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-08-05T09:32:49Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2022-08-05T09:32:49Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2022 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Desalination, 2022, v. 525, p. 115505 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0011-9164 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/314689 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Configurations of crossflow filtration cells are important to determine membrane separation performance in laboratory studies. We systematically investigated the effects of crossflow filtration cell designs, including sealing approaches and back support configurations, on the determination of membrane water flux, salts rejection, and fouling behaviour. In particular, the definition of effective filtration area in the O-ring sealed cell could lead to an overestimated (defined as flow channel area) or underestimated (defined as O-ring enclosed area) membrane water flux compared to the benchmark data acquired from a silicone gasket sealed cell. In addition, it was found that the highly porous back support could yield higher water flux and salt rejection as well as better antifouling performance than that of the perforated plate support. The porous back support could significantly reduce the total resistance to water permeation thanks to the minimized average path length and increased hydraulic conductance for water transport. Moreover, the porous back support enabled better control of concentration polarization as it avoided local flux ‘hot spots’ that would occur above local perforations, and thus benefits membrane rejections. These findings provide important insights into the design of crossflow filtration cells for a more reliable and representative determination of membrane separation performance. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Desalination | - |
dc.title | Effects of crossflow filtration cell configuration on membrane separation performance and fouling behaviour | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.email | Guo, H: guohao7@hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.email | Tang, C: tangc@hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.authority | Guo, H=rp02772 | - |
dc.identifier.authority | Tang, C=rp01765 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.desal.2021.115505 | - |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 334786 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 525 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 115505 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 115505 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000782123600004 | - |