File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Plateau effect of prostate cancer risk-associated SNPs in discriminating prostate biopsy outcomes

TitlePlateau effect of prostate cancer risk-associated SNPs in discriminating prostate biopsy outcomes
Authors
KeywordsAUC
biopsy
ChinaPCa
genetic score
prostate
SNPs
Issue Date2013
Citation
Prostate, 2013, v. 73, n. 16, p. 1824-1835 How to Cite?
AbstractBACKGROUND Additional prostate cancer (PCa) risk-associated single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) continue to be identified. It is unclear whether addition of newly identified SNPs improves the discriminative performance of biopsy outcomes over previously established SNPs. METHODS A total of 667 consecutive patients that underwent prostate biopsy for detection of PCa at Huashan Hospital and Changhai Hospital, Shanghai, China were recruited. Genetic scores were calculated for each patient using various combinations of 29 PCa risk-associated SNPs. Performance of these genetic scores for discriminating prostate biopsy outcomes were compared using the area under a receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). RESULTS The discriminative performance of genetic score derived from a panel of all 29 SNPs (24 previous and 5 new) was similar to that derived from the 24 previously established SNPs, the AUC of which were 0.60 and 0.61, respectively (P = 0.72). When SNPs with the strongest effect on PCa risk (ranked based on contribution to the total genetic variance from an external study) were sequentially added to the models for calculating genetic score, the AUC gradually increased and peaked at 0.62 with the top 13 strongest SNPs. Under the 13-SNP model, the PCa detection rate was 21.52%, 36.74%, and 51.98%, respectively for men with low (<0.5), intermediate (0.5-1.5), and high (>1.5) genetic score, P-trend = 9.91 × 10-6. CONCLUSION Genetic score based on PCa risk-associated SNPs implicated to date is a significant predictor of biopsy outcome. Additional small-effect PCa risk-associated SNPs to be discovered in the future are unlikely to further improve predictive performance. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/314380
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 2.6
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.032
PubMed Central ID
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRen, Shancheng-
dc.contributor.authorXu, Jianfeng-
dc.contributor.authorZhou, Tie-
dc.contributor.authorJiang, Haowen-
dc.contributor.authorChen, Haitao-
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Fang-
dc.contributor.authorNa, Rong-
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Limin-
dc.contributor.authorWu, Yishuo-
dc.contributor.authorSun, Jielin-
dc.contributor.authorYang, Bo-
dc.contributor.authorGao, Xu-
dc.contributor.authorZheng, S. Lilly-
dc.contributor.authorXu, Chuanliang-
dc.contributor.authorDing, Qiang-
dc.contributor.authorSun, Yinghao-
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-20T12:03:49Z-
dc.date.available2022-07-20T12:03:49Z-
dc.date.issued2013-
dc.identifier.citationProstate, 2013, v. 73, n. 16, p. 1824-1835-
dc.identifier.issn0270-4137-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/314380-
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND Additional prostate cancer (PCa) risk-associated single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) continue to be identified. It is unclear whether addition of newly identified SNPs improves the discriminative performance of biopsy outcomes over previously established SNPs. METHODS A total of 667 consecutive patients that underwent prostate biopsy for detection of PCa at Huashan Hospital and Changhai Hospital, Shanghai, China were recruited. Genetic scores were calculated for each patient using various combinations of 29 PCa risk-associated SNPs. Performance of these genetic scores for discriminating prostate biopsy outcomes were compared using the area under a receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). RESULTS The discriminative performance of genetic score derived from a panel of all 29 SNPs (24 previous and 5 new) was similar to that derived from the 24 previously established SNPs, the AUC of which were 0.60 and 0.61, respectively (P = 0.72). When SNPs with the strongest effect on PCa risk (ranked based on contribution to the total genetic variance from an external study) were sequentially added to the models for calculating genetic score, the AUC gradually increased and peaked at 0.62 with the top 13 strongest SNPs. Under the 13-SNP model, the PCa detection rate was 21.52%, 36.74%, and 51.98%, respectively for men with low (<0.5), intermediate (0.5-1.5), and high (>1.5) genetic score, P-trend = 9.91 × 10-6. CONCLUSION Genetic score based on PCa risk-associated SNPs implicated to date is a significant predictor of biopsy outcome. Additional small-effect PCa risk-associated SNPs to be discovered in the future are unlikely to further improve predictive performance. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofProstate-
dc.subjectAUC-
dc.subjectbiopsy-
dc.subjectChinaPCa-
dc.subjectgenetic score-
dc.subjectprostate-
dc.subjectSNPs-
dc.titlePlateau effect of prostate cancer risk-associated SNPs in discriminating prostate biopsy outcomes-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/pros.22721-
dc.identifier.pmid24037738-
dc.identifier.pmcidPMC3910089-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-84886946836-
dc.identifier.volume73-
dc.identifier.issue16-
dc.identifier.spage1824-
dc.identifier.epage1835-
dc.identifier.eissn1097-0045-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000326048800011-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats