File Download
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1007/s40263-013-0091-9
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-84885441198
- PMID: 23918722
- WOS: WOS:000324879300004
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of perampanel in the treatment of partial-onset epilepsy
Title | Systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of perampanel in the treatment of partial-onset epilepsy |
---|---|
Authors | |
Issue Date | 2013 |
Citation | CNS Drugs, 2013, v. 27, n. 10, p. 817-827 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Introduction: Perampanel is a first-in-class antiepileptic drug approved for adjunctive treatment of partial-onset seizure in patients aged 12 years or older. Published randomised controlled trials (RCTs) had small sample sizes, and meta-analyses have included too few studies to draw conclusive results for the assessment of tolerability, efficacy and safety of perampanel. There is a need to conduct a meta-analysis with a larger dataset and an appropriate study design. Objective: The aim of this study was to systematically review the efficacy and safety of perampanel in the treatment of partial-onset epilepsy. Methods: Electronic and clinical trials databases were searched for RCTs of perampanel published up to March 2013. Outcomes of interest were 50 % responder rates, seizure freedom, treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and incidence of withdrawal. Meta-analysis was performed to investigate the outcomes of interest. Results: Five RCTs with a total of 1,678 subjects were included. The 50 % responder rates were significantly greater in patients receiving 4, 8 and 12 mg perampanel versus placebo, with risk ratios of 1.54 (95 % CI 1.11-2.13), 1.80 (95 % CI 1.38-2.35) and 1.72 (95 % CI 1.17-2.52), respectively. There was no statistical evidence of a difference in seizure freedom between 8 or 12 mg perampanel and placebo. Of the five commonly reported TEAEs included, both dizziness and somnolence were statistically associated with 8 mg perampanel, whilst dizziness was statistically associated with 12 mg perampanel. Incidences of withdrawal due to adverse events were significantly higher in the 8 mg and 12 mg perampanel groups versus placebo. Conclusion: The use of perampanel resulted in a statistically significant reduction of seizure frequency with respect to the 50 % responder rate in patients with partial-onset epilepsy. Perampanel is well tolerated at 4 mg and reasonably tolerated at 8 and 12 mg. Further clinical and pharmacovigilance studies are required to investigate the long-term efficacy and safety of perampanel in the management of other types of epilepsy. © 2013 The Author(s). |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/311958 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 7.4 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.616 |
ISI Accession Number ID | |
Errata |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Hsu, Warrington W.Q. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Sing, C. W. | - |
dc.contributor.author | He, Ying | - |
dc.contributor.author | Worsley, Alan J. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Wong, Ian C.K. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Chan, Esther W. | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-04-06T04:31:51Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2022-04-06T04:31:51Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2013 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | CNS Drugs, 2013, v. 27, n. 10, p. 817-827 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1172-7047 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/311958 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Introduction: Perampanel is a first-in-class antiepileptic drug approved for adjunctive treatment of partial-onset seizure in patients aged 12 years or older. Published randomised controlled trials (RCTs) had small sample sizes, and meta-analyses have included too few studies to draw conclusive results for the assessment of tolerability, efficacy and safety of perampanel. There is a need to conduct a meta-analysis with a larger dataset and an appropriate study design. Objective: The aim of this study was to systematically review the efficacy and safety of perampanel in the treatment of partial-onset epilepsy. Methods: Electronic and clinical trials databases were searched for RCTs of perampanel published up to March 2013. Outcomes of interest were 50 % responder rates, seizure freedom, treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and incidence of withdrawal. Meta-analysis was performed to investigate the outcomes of interest. Results: Five RCTs with a total of 1,678 subjects were included. The 50 % responder rates were significantly greater in patients receiving 4, 8 and 12 mg perampanel versus placebo, with risk ratios of 1.54 (95 % CI 1.11-2.13), 1.80 (95 % CI 1.38-2.35) and 1.72 (95 % CI 1.17-2.52), respectively. There was no statistical evidence of a difference in seizure freedom between 8 or 12 mg perampanel and placebo. Of the five commonly reported TEAEs included, both dizziness and somnolence were statistically associated with 8 mg perampanel, whilst dizziness was statistically associated with 12 mg perampanel. Incidences of withdrawal due to adverse events were significantly higher in the 8 mg and 12 mg perampanel groups versus placebo. Conclusion: The use of perampanel resulted in a statistically significant reduction of seizure frequency with respect to the 50 % responder rate in patients with partial-onset epilepsy. Perampanel is well tolerated at 4 mg and reasonably tolerated at 8 and 12 mg. Further clinical and pharmacovigilance studies are required to investigate the long-term efficacy and safety of perampanel in the management of other types of epilepsy. © 2013 The Author(s). | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | CNS Drugs | - |
dc.rights | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. | - |
dc.title | Systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of perampanel in the treatment of partial-onset epilepsy | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.description.nature | published_or_final_version | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/s40263-013-0091-9 | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 23918722 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-84885441198 | - |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 226195 | - |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 218703 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 27 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 10 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 817 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 827 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1179-1934 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000324879300004 | - |
dc.relation.erratum | doi:10.1007/s40263-013-0125-3 | - |
dc.relation.erratum | eid:eid_2-s2.0-84890463187 | - |