File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Initial Coin offerings: what rights do investors have?

TitleInitial Coin offerings: what rights do investors have?
Authors
KeywordsDisclosure
Fintech
Fraud
Initial Coin Offering
Investor Protection
Shareholder right
Issue Date2021
Citation
European Journal of Finance, 2021, v. 27, n. 4-5, p. 305-320 How to Cite?
AbstractThis paper reviews the growing literature on initial coin offerings (ICOs) and provides original evidence of the investor protection on ICOs from 37 countries. We show that the anti-director rights and anti-self-dealing index are positively associated with the country-level raised fund of ICOs after controlling for economic and culture factors. The disclosure quality and investor rights as specified in the Whitepapers are generally poor and they are found to be important to raise more funds in ICOs. We argue that the lack of (self-) discipline poses a threat to investor protections. Around 60% Whitepaper do not disclose information on the use of proceeds or management team. Around 80% ICOs do not entitle investors the rights for dividend or vote. Our findings suggest the needs of regulating ICOs to protect investors.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/311948
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 2.2
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.868
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorZhao, Xiaoju-
dc.contributor.authorHou, Wenxuan-
dc.contributor.authorAn, Jiafu-
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Xianda-
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Yun-
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-06T04:31:49Z-
dc.date.available2022-04-06T04:31:49Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.citationEuropean Journal of Finance, 2021, v. 27, n. 4-5, p. 305-320-
dc.identifier.issn1351-847X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/311948-
dc.description.abstractThis paper reviews the growing literature on initial coin offerings (ICOs) and provides original evidence of the investor protection on ICOs from 37 countries. We show that the anti-director rights and anti-self-dealing index are positively associated with the country-level raised fund of ICOs after controlling for economic and culture factors. The disclosure quality and investor rights as specified in the Whitepapers are generally poor and they are found to be important to raise more funds in ICOs. We argue that the lack of (self-) discipline poses a threat to investor protections. Around 60% Whitepaper do not disclose information on the use of proceeds or management team. Around 80% ICOs do not entitle investors the rights for dividend or vote. Our findings suggest the needs of regulating ICOs to protect investors.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean Journal of Finance-
dc.subjectDisclosure-
dc.subjectFintech-
dc.subjectFraud-
dc.subjectInitial Coin Offering-
dc.subjectInvestor Protection-
dc.subjectShareholder right-
dc.titleInitial Coin offerings: what rights do investors have?-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/1351847X.2020.1858130-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85097527656-
dc.identifier.volume27-
dc.identifier.issue4-5-
dc.identifier.spage305-
dc.identifier.epage320-
dc.identifier.eissn1466-4364-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000598941700001-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats