File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Supplementary
-
Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: AI’s Future Impact on Copyright for AI-Generated Work: Insights from Chinese Case Law
| Title | AI’s Future Impact on Copyright for AI-Generated Work: Insights from Chinese Case Law |
|---|---|
| Authors | |
| Issue Date | 2022 |
| Publisher | Sweet and Maxwell. |
| Citation | European Intellectual Property Review , 2022, v. 44 How to Cite? |
| Abstract | AI generated work presents a significant challenge to established rules of copyright. The paper provides insight into two landmark cases from the People’s Republic of China that directly deal with the issues of copyright raised by artificially generated works. Through the analysis of those cases, the paper offers a first in assessing judicial reasoning applied to AI generated works. The originality of AI generated works, including both the acts of the AI software and human users of that software, is discussed using a comparative approach between PRC, US, UK and EU law. The “arrangers” provision with the Copyright, Design and Patents Act 1988 is analysed and cross applied to those recent cases to demonstrate that it offers other jurisdictions a solid template for dealing with authorship disputes of AI generated work. |
| Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/311732 |
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Southworth, E. | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Li, Y | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-04-01T09:12:29Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2022-04-01T09:12:29Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2022 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | European Intellectual Property Review , 2022, v. 44 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/311732 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | AI generated work presents a significant challenge to established rules of copyright. The paper provides insight into two landmark cases from the People’s Republic of China that directly deal with the issues of copyright raised by artificially generated works. Through the analysis of those cases, the paper offers a first in assessing judicial reasoning applied to AI generated works. The originality of AI generated works, including both the acts of the AI software and human users of that software, is discussed using a comparative approach between PRC, US, UK and EU law. The “arrangers” provision with the Copyright, Design and Patents Act 1988 is analysed and cross applied to those recent cases to demonstrate that it offers other jurisdictions a solid template for dealing with authorship disputes of AI generated work. | - |
| dc.language | eng | - |
| dc.publisher | Sweet and Maxwell. | - |
| dc.relation.ispartof | European Intellectual Property Review | - |
| dc.title | AI’s Future Impact on Copyright for AI-Generated Work: Insights from Chinese Case Law | - |
| dc.type | Article | - |
| dc.identifier.email | Li, Y: yali@hku.hk | - |
| dc.identifier.authority | Li, Y=rp01260 | - |
| dc.identifier.hkuros | 332301 | - |
| dc.identifier.volume | 44 | - |
| dc.publisher.place | Global | - |