File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Feasibility of case-control and test-negative designs to evaluate dengue vaccine effectiveness in Malaysia

TitleFeasibility of case-control and test-negative designs to evaluate dengue vaccine effectiveness in Malaysia
Authors
KeywordsCase-control
Dengue
Malaysia
Vaccine effectiveness
Issue Date2019
Citation
Vaccine, 2019, v. 37, n. 39, p. 5891-5898 How to Cite?
AbstractBackground: The world's first dengue vaccine [Dengvaxia; Sanofi Pasteur] was licensed in 2015 and others are in development. Real-world evaluations of dengue vaccines will therefore soon be needed. We assessed feasibility of case control (CC) and test-negative (TN) design studies for dengue vaccine effectiveness by measuring associations between socio-demographic risk factors, and hospitalized dengue outcomes, in Malaysia. Methods: Following ethical approval, we conducted hospital-based dengue surveillance for one year in three referral hospitals. Suspected cases aged 9–25 years underwent dengue virological confirmation by RT-PCR and/or NS1 Ag ELISA at a central laboratory. Two age- and geography-matched hospitalized non-dengue case-controls were recruited for a traditional CC study. Suspected cases testing negative were test-negative controls. Socio-demographic, risk factor and routine laboratory data were collected. Logistic regression models were used to estimate associations between confirmed dengue and risk factors. Results: We recruited 327 subjects; 155 were suspected of dengue. The planned sample size was not met. 124 (80%) of suspected cases were dengue-confirmed; seven were assessed as severe. Three had missing RT-PCR results; the study recruited 28 test-negative controls. Only 172 matched controls could be recruited; 90 cases were matched with ≥1 controls. Characteristics of cases and controls were mostly similar. By CC design, two variables were significant risk factors for hospitalized dengue: recent household dengue contact (OR: 54, 95% CI: 7.3–397) and recent neighbourhood insecticidal fogging (OR: 2.1; 95% CI: 1.3–3.6). In the TN design, no risk factors were identified. In comparison with gold-standard diagnostics, routine tests performed poorly. Conclusions: The CC design may be more appropriate than the TN design for hospitalized dengue vaccine effectiveness studies. Selection bias in case control selection could be minimized by protocol changes more easily than increasing TN design control numbers, because early-stage dengue diagnosis in endemic countries is highly specific. MREC study approval: (39)KKM/NIHSEC/P16-1334.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/311544
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 4.5
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.342
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNealon, Joshua-
dc.contributor.authorLim, Wei Yin-
dc.contributor.authorMoureau, Annick-
dc.contributor.authorLinus Lojikip, Sharon-
dc.contributor.authorJunus, Suria-
dc.contributor.authorKumar, Suresh-
dc.contributor.authorNachiappan, Jeyaseelan P.-
dc.contributor.authorDevi Sekaran, Shamala-
dc.contributor.authorRadigue, Cedric-
dc.contributor.authorCowling, Benjamin J.-
dc.contributor.authorOchiai, R. Leon-
dc.contributor.authorHSS, Amar Singh-
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-22T11:54:11Z-
dc.date.available2022-03-22T11:54:11Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.citationVaccine, 2019, v. 37, n. 39, p. 5891-5898-
dc.identifier.issn0264-410X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/311544-
dc.description.abstractBackground: The world's first dengue vaccine [Dengvaxia; Sanofi Pasteur] was licensed in 2015 and others are in development. Real-world evaluations of dengue vaccines will therefore soon be needed. We assessed feasibility of case control (CC) and test-negative (TN) design studies for dengue vaccine effectiveness by measuring associations between socio-demographic risk factors, and hospitalized dengue outcomes, in Malaysia. Methods: Following ethical approval, we conducted hospital-based dengue surveillance for one year in three referral hospitals. Suspected cases aged 9–25 years underwent dengue virological confirmation by RT-PCR and/or NS1 Ag ELISA at a central laboratory. Two age- and geography-matched hospitalized non-dengue case-controls were recruited for a traditional CC study. Suspected cases testing negative were test-negative controls. Socio-demographic, risk factor and routine laboratory data were collected. Logistic regression models were used to estimate associations between confirmed dengue and risk factors. Results: We recruited 327 subjects; 155 were suspected of dengue. The planned sample size was not met. 124 (80%) of suspected cases were dengue-confirmed; seven were assessed as severe. Three had missing RT-PCR results; the study recruited 28 test-negative controls. Only 172 matched controls could be recruited; 90 cases were matched with ≥1 controls. Characteristics of cases and controls were mostly similar. By CC design, two variables were significant risk factors for hospitalized dengue: recent household dengue contact (OR: 54, 95% CI: 7.3–397) and recent neighbourhood insecticidal fogging (OR: 2.1; 95% CI: 1.3–3.6). In the TN design, no risk factors were identified. In comparison with gold-standard diagnostics, routine tests performed poorly. Conclusions: The CC design may be more appropriate than the TN design for hospitalized dengue vaccine effectiveness studies. Selection bias in case control selection could be minimized by protocol changes more easily than increasing TN design control numbers, because early-stage dengue diagnosis in endemic countries is highly specific. MREC study approval: (39)KKM/NIHSEC/P16-1334.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofVaccine-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectCase-control-
dc.subjectDengue-
dc.subjectMalaysia-
dc.subjectVaccine effectiveness-
dc.titleFeasibility of case-control and test-negative designs to evaluate dengue vaccine effectiveness in Malaysia-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturepublished_or_final_version-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.07.083-
dc.identifier.pmid31445770-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85070863502-
dc.identifier.volume37-
dc.identifier.issue39-
dc.identifier.spage5891-
dc.identifier.epage5898-
dc.identifier.eissn1873-2518-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000487175700012-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats