File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Supplementary
-
Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Conference Paper: Are rigid cervical collars necessary for patients undergoing open-door laminoplasty and titanium arch plates for cervical myelopathy? – a randomized pilot clinical trial
| Title | Are rigid cervical collars necessary for patients undergoing open-door laminoplasty and titanium arch plates for cervical myelopathy? – a randomized pilot clinical trial |
|---|---|
| Authors | |
| Issue Date | 2021 |
| Publisher | Food and Health Bureau, HKSAR |
| Citation | Health Research Symposium 2021: Implementing evidence-based research in the era of COVID-19 and other global health challenges, Hong Kong, 23 November 2021 How to Cite? |
| Abstract | Introduction and Project Objectives: Cervical collars are used
after laminoplasty to protect the hinge opening, reduce risks of
hinge fractures and avoid springback phenomena. However, its
use may lead to reduced range of motion, axial neck pain and
increased cost. We aim to investigate the clinical, radiological
and functional outcomes of patients undergoing hinge
laminoplasty with or without cervical collar immobilization by
randomized controlled trial.
Methods: This was a prospective, parallel single-blinded
randomized controlled trial. Patients undergoing laminoplasty
for cervical myelopathy were randomly allocated into two
groups based on the use of collar postoperatively for 3 weeks.
Clinical assessments included cervical range of motion, axial
pain (visual analogue scale/VAS), and objective scores (36-item
short form/SF-36, Neck disability index/NDI, modified Japanese
Orthopaedic Association/mJOA). Patients’ group allocation
was blinded to 3 assessors during radiographic measurements
which included cervical alignment, spinal canal diameter and
complications (implant loosening, springback). All assessments
were per formed preoperatively and at postoperative
1-week, 2-weeks, 3-weeks, 6-weeks, 3-months, 6-months and 12-months. Comparative analysis was performed via analysis
of variance adjusted by the baseline scores, sex and age as
covariates.
Results: A total of 35 patients with mean age of 64.9±11.4 years
at surgery were consecutively recruited and randomized to
collar use (n=16) and without collar immobilization (n=19). All
patients completed all follow-up assessments without dropout,
and had no complications. There were no differences between
groups at baseline. Subjects had comparable mJOA scores,
SF-36, NDI and range of motion at postoperative timepoints.
Patients without collar use had higher VAS at postoperative
1-week (5.4 vs 3.5; p=0.038) and 2-weeks (3.5 vs 1.5; p=0.028)
but subsequently follow-up revealed no differences between
the two groups.
Conclusion: The use of a rigid collar after laminoplasty leads
to less axial neck pain in the first two weeks after surgery.
However, there is no additional benefit with regards to range of
motion, quality of life, and complication risk. This difference in
pain response only impacts in the initial postoperative period
and does not impact the overall quality of life of patients. |
| Description | Poster Presentation: Health and Health Services - no. HHS-48-94 Organized by the Food and Health Bureau, The Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region |
| Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/311301 |
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Cheung, JPY | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-03-21T08:47:44Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2022-03-21T08:47:44Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2021 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Health Research Symposium 2021: Implementing evidence-based research in the era of COVID-19 and other global health challenges, Hong Kong, 23 November 2021 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/311301 | - |
| dc.description | Poster Presentation: Health and Health Services - no. HHS-48-94 | - |
| dc.description | Organized by the Food and Health Bureau, The Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region | - |
| dc.description.abstract | Introduction and Project Objectives: Cervical collars are used after laminoplasty to protect the hinge opening, reduce risks of hinge fractures and avoid springback phenomena. However, its use may lead to reduced range of motion, axial neck pain and increased cost. We aim to investigate the clinical, radiological and functional outcomes of patients undergoing hinge laminoplasty with or without cervical collar immobilization by randomized controlled trial. Methods: This was a prospective, parallel single-blinded randomized controlled trial. Patients undergoing laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy were randomly allocated into two groups based on the use of collar postoperatively for 3 weeks. Clinical assessments included cervical range of motion, axial pain (visual analogue scale/VAS), and objective scores (36-item short form/SF-36, Neck disability index/NDI, modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association/mJOA). Patients’ group allocation was blinded to 3 assessors during radiographic measurements which included cervical alignment, spinal canal diameter and complications (implant loosening, springback). All assessments were per formed preoperatively and at postoperative 1-week, 2-weeks, 3-weeks, 6-weeks, 3-months, 6-months and 12-months. Comparative analysis was performed via analysis of variance adjusted by the baseline scores, sex and age as covariates. Results: A total of 35 patients with mean age of 64.9±11.4 years at surgery were consecutively recruited and randomized to collar use (n=16) and without collar immobilization (n=19). All patients completed all follow-up assessments without dropout, and had no complications. There were no differences between groups at baseline. Subjects had comparable mJOA scores, SF-36, NDI and range of motion at postoperative timepoints. Patients without collar use had higher VAS at postoperative 1-week (5.4 vs 3.5; p=0.038) and 2-weeks (3.5 vs 1.5; p=0.028) but subsequently follow-up revealed no differences between the two groups. Conclusion: The use of a rigid collar after laminoplasty leads to less axial neck pain in the first two weeks after surgery. However, there is no additional benefit with regards to range of motion, quality of life, and complication risk. This difference in pain response only impacts in the initial postoperative period and does not impact the overall quality of life of patients. | - |
| dc.language | eng | - |
| dc.publisher | Food and Health Bureau, HKSAR | - |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Health Research Symposium 2021 | - |
| dc.title | Are rigid cervical collars necessary for patients undergoing open-door laminoplasty and titanium arch plates for cervical myelopathy? – a randomized pilot clinical trial | - |
| dc.type | Conference_Paper | - |
| dc.identifier.email | Cheung, JPY: cheungjp@hku.hk | - |
| dc.identifier.authority | Cheung, JPY=rp01685 | - |
| dc.identifier.hkuros | 332175 | - |
| dc.publisher.place | Hong Kong | - |
