File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

Supplementary

Conference Paper: From legal pluralism to dual state: evolution of the relationship between the Chinese and Hong Kong legal orders

TitleFrom legal pluralism to dual state: evolution of the relationship between the Chinese and Hong Kong legal orders
Authors
Issue Date2021
Citation
The 16th International Human Rights Researchers' Workshop: Mixed Constitutions and Human Rights, Virtual Conference, College of Law and Business, Tel Aviv, Israel, 2-4 May 2021 How to Cite?
AbstractThis paper argues that the relationship between the Chinese and Hong Kong legal orders has evolved from a form of legal pluralism found in the European Union, to a monist but bifurcated status – a “dual state”, to borrow from Ernst Fraenkel’s theory. Recent events, including China’s imposition of a national security law on Hong Kong and the former’s overhaul of the latter’s election methods, have consolidated the change. The picture that emerges is that Hong Kong’s common law legal system from the liberal rule-of-law tradition has definitively become a dual state that is folded within China’s socialist legal system, which is itself a dual state. The analysis not only reveals the potential and challenges of preserving liberal values in an authoritarian polity, but also enhances our understanding of the theory of the dual state.
DescriptionOrganized by the College of Law and Business in Israel, Faculty of Law, the University of Hong Kong, and Instituto Tecnológico Autónomo de México
Panel 5: Legal hybridities: dual states and legal pluralism (I)
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/310479

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChan, CSW-
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-07T07:57:15Z-
dc.date.available2022-02-07T07:57:15Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.citationThe 16th International Human Rights Researchers' Workshop: Mixed Constitutions and Human Rights, Virtual Conference, College of Law and Business, Tel Aviv, Israel, 2-4 May 2021-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/310479-
dc.descriptionOrganized by the College of Law and Business in Israel, Faculty of Law, the University of Hong Kong, and Instituto Tecnológico Autónomo de México-
dc.descriptionPanel 5: Legal hybridities: dual states and legal pluralism (I)-
dc.description.abstractThis paper argues that the relationship between the Chinese and Hong Kong legal orders has evolved from a form of legal pluralism found in the European Union, to a monist but bifurcated status – a “dual state”, to borrow from Ernst Fraenkel’s theory. Recent events, including China’s imposition of a national security law on Hong Kong and the former’s overhaul of the latter’s election methods, have consolidated the change. The picture that emerges is that Hong Kong’s common law legal system from the liberal rule-of-law tradition has definitively become a dual state that is folded within China’s socialist legal system, which is itself a dual state. The analysis not only reveals the potential and challenges of preserving liberal values in an authoritarian polity, but also enhances our understanding of the theory of the dual state.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofThe 16th International Human Rights Researchers' Workshop: Mixed Constitutions and Human Rights-
dc.titleFrom legal pluralism to dual state: evolution of the relationship between the Chinese and Hong Kong legal orders-
dc.typeConference_Paper-
dc.identifier.emailChan, CSW: corachan@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityChan, CSW=rp01296-
dc.identifier.hkuros331802-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats