File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Document type assignment by Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, and publishers to “Top 100” papers

TitleDocument type assignment by Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, and publishers to “Top 100” papers
Authors
KeywordsDatabase industry
Publishing
Websites
Job fairs
Issue Date2021
PublisherUniversity of Malaya, Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology.
Citation
Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, 2021, v. 26 n. 3, p. 97-103 How to Cite?
AbstractDocument type (DT) assignment is an important feature from literature databases. This work evaluated how the literature databases and the publisher websites labeled “Top 100” (T100) papers, a recurring act for which researchers identify and analyze the 100 most cited entities (e.g. articles) within a pre-defined literature set. T100 papers concurrently indexed in the Web of Science (WoS), Scopus and PubMed databses were identified. Among the 248 T100 papers analyzed, no general consensus or consistent pattern was found for labeling T100 papers by the three data sources and the publishers’ websites. All four sources labeled between 30–40% of the T100 papers as reviews. However, PubMed mostly did not give DT labels to the rest of the papers whereas WOS, Scopus, and publisher websites labeled them as articles. The inter-rater agreement was only fair; the decision seemed to be influenced by whether the authors mentioned the word “review” suggestive of the publication/document type in the title, abstract or keywords. … Rea
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/310116
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 0.5
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.331
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorYeung, WKA-
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-24T02:24:03Z-
dc.date.available2022-01-24T02:24:03Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.citationMalaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, 2021, v. 26 n. 3, p. 97-103-
dc.identifier.issn1394-6234-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/310116-
dc.description.abstractDocument type (DT) assignment is an important feature from literature databases. This work evaluated how the literature databases and the publisher websites labeled “Top 100” (T100) papers, a recurring act for which researchers identify and analyze the 100 most cited entities (e.g. articles) within a pre-defined literature set. T100 papers concurrently indexed in the Web of Science (WoS), Scopus and PubMed databses were identified. Among the 248 T100 papers analyzed, no general consensus or consistent pattern was found for labeling T100 papers by the three data sources and the publishers’ websites. All four sources labeled between 30–40% of the T100 papers as reviews. However, PubMed mostly did not give DT labels to the rest of the papers whereas WOS, Scopus, and publisher websites labeled them as articles. The inter-rater agreement was only fair; the decision seemed to be influenced by whether the authors mentioned the word “review” suggestive of the publication/document type in the title, abstract or keywords. … Rea-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherUniversity of Malaya, Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology.-
dc.relation.ispartofMalaysian Journal of Library & Information Science-
dc.subjectDatabase industry-
dc.subjectPublishing-
dc.subjectWebsites-
dc.subjectJob fairs-
dc.titleDocument type assignment by Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, and publishers to “Top 100” papers-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailYeung, WKA: ndyeung@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityYeung, WKA=rp02143-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.22452/mjlis.vol26no3.5-
dc.identifier.hkuros331452-
dc.identifier.volume26-
dc.identifier.issue3-
dc.identifier.spage97-
dc.identifier.epage103-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000748926900003-
dc.publisher.placeMalaysia-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats