File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: The wildlife snaring crisis: an insidious and pervasive threat to biodiversity in Southeast Asia

TitleThe wildlife snaring crisis: an insidious and pervasive threat to biodiversity in Southeast Asia
Authors
KeywordsExtinction crisis
Mammal conservation
Natural resource management
Poaching
Protected area
Issue Date2018
Citation
Biodiversity and Conservation, 2018, v. 27, n. 4, p. 1031-1037 How to Cite?
AbstractSoutheast Asia, a region supporting more threatened species than any other comparable continental area, is in the midst of a conservation crisis. Hunting constitutes the greatest current threat to the region’s threatened vertebrates and has resulted in many areas of largely intact forest losing much of their former vertebrate diversity and abundance. Though numerous hunting methods are used, capture with home-made snares is a major driver of this defaunation. Snares are cheaply constructed and easy to set but can be difficult to detect and are highly damaging to vertebrate populations due to their indiscriminate and wasteful nature. The primary response to snaring is the removal of snares by patrol teams: more than 200,000 snares were removed from just five of the region’s protected areas between 2010 and 2015. However due to the low opportunity costs of replacing snares, removal alone is largely ineffective. Without the proactive search, arrest and prosecution of snare-setters, along with incentives not to hunt, snares will continue to be replaced. Legislative reform that criminalises the possession of snares, and the materials used for their construction, inside and immediately adjacent to protected areas is also required. Consistent enforcement of such legislation is essential. This must be combined with longer-term demand reduction activities aimed at changing cultural attitudes and behaviors related to the consumption of wildlife products in Southeast Asia.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/309493
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 3.0
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.954
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGray, Thomas N.E.-
dc.contributor.authorHughes, Alice C.-
dc.contributor.authorLaurance, William F.-
dc.contributor.authorLong, Barney-
dc.contributor.authorLynam, Anthony J.-
dc.contributor.authorO’Kelly, Hannah-
dc.contributor.authorRipple, William J.-
dc.contributor.authorSeng, Teak-
dc.contributor.authorScotson, Lorraine-
dc.contributor.authorWilkinson, Nicholas M.-
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-29T07:02:34Z-
dc.date.available2021-12-29T07:02:34Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.citationBiodiversity and Conservation, 2018, v. 27, n. 4, p. 1031-1037-
dc.identifier.issn0960-3115-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/309493-
dc.description.abstractSoutheast Asia, a region supporting more threatened species than any other comparable continental area, is in the midst of a conservation crisis. Hunting constitutes the greatest current threat to the region’s threatened vertebrates and has resulted in many areas of largely intact forest losing much of their former vertebrate diversity and abundance. Though numerous hunting methods are used, capture with home-made snares is a major driver of this defaunation. Snares are cheaply constructed and easy to set but can be difficult to detect and are highly damaging to vertebrate populations due to their indiscriminate and wasteful nature. The primary response to snaring is the removal of snares by patrol teams: more than 200,000 snares were removed from just five of the region’s protected areas between 2010 and 2015. However due to the low opportunity costs of replacing snares, removal alone is largely ineffective. Without the proactive search, arrest and prosecution of snare-setters, along with incentives not to hunt, snares will continue to be replaced. Legislative reform that criminalises the possession of snares, and the materials used for their construction, inside and immediately adjacent to protected areas is also required. Consistent enforcement of such legislation is essential. This must be combined with longer-term demand reduction activities aimed at changing cultural attitudes and behaviors related to the consumption of wildlife products in Southeast Asia.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofBiodiversity and Conservation-
dc.subjectExtinction crisis-
dc.subjectMammal conservation-
dc.subjectNatural resource management-
dc.subjectPoaching-
dc.subjectProtected area-
dc.titleThe wildlife snaring crisis: an insidious and pervasive threat to biodiversity in Southeast Asia-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10531-017-1450-5-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85031397280-
dc.identifier.volume27-
dc.identifier.issue4-
dc.identifier.spage1031-
dc.identifier.epage1037-
dc.identifier.eissn1572-9710-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000425295800013-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats