File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1029/2020JD033446
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85097653664
- WOS: WOS:000599939900005
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Land Surface Temperature Trend and Its Drivers in East Africa
Title | Land Surface Temperature Trend and Its Drivers in East Africa |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | land surface temperature MERRA-2 MODIS Aqua surface energy balance trend |
Issue Date | 2020 |
Citation | Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 2020, v. 125, n. 23, article no. e2020JD033446 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Land surface temperature (LST) is affected by surface-atmosphere interaction. Yet, the degree to which surface and atmospheric factors impact the magnitude of LST trend is not well established. Here, we used surface energy balance, boosted regression tree model, and satellite observation and reanalysis data to unravel the effects of surface factors (albedo, sensible heat, latent heat, and ground heat) as well as incoming radiation (shortwave and longwave) on LST trends in East Africa (EA). Our result showed that 11% of EA was affected by significant (p < 0.05) daytime annual LST trends, which exhibited both cooling of −0.19 K year−1 (mainly in South Sudan and Sudan) and warming of 0.22 K year−1 (mainly in Somalia and Kenya). The nighttime LST trends affected a large part of EA (31%) and were dominated by significant warming trend (0.06 K year−1). Influenced by contrasting daytime and nighttime LST trends, the diurnal LST range reduced in 15% of EA. The modeling result showed that latent heat flux (32%), incoming longwave radiation (30%), and shortwave radiation (23%) were stronger in explaining daytime LST trend. The effects of surface factors were stronger in both cooling and warming trends, whereas atmospheric factors had stronger control only on surface cooling trends. These results indicate the differential control of surface and atmospheric factors on warming and cooling trends, highlighting the importance of considering both factors for accurate evaluation of the LST trends in the future. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/309277 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 3.8 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.710 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Abera, Temesgen Alemayehu | - |
dc.contributor.author | Heiskanen, Janne | - |
dc.contributor.author | Maeda, Eduardo Eiji | - |
dc.contributor.author | Pellikka, Petri K.E. | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-12-15T03:59:53Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-12-15T03:59:53Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 2020, v. 125, n. 23, article no. e2020JD033446 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 2169-897X | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/309277 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Land surface temperature (LST) is affected by surface-atmosphere interaction. Yet, the degree to which surface and atmospheric factors impact the magnitude of LST trend is not well established. Here, we used surface energy balance, boosted regression tree model, and satellite observation and reanalysis data to unravel the effects of surface factors (albedo, sensible heat, latent heat, and ground heat) as well as incoming radiation (shortwave and longwave) on LST trends in East Africa (EA). Our result showed that 11% of EA was affected by significant (p < 0.05) daytime annual LST trends, which exhibited both cooling of −0.19 K year−1 (mainly in South Sudan and Sudan) and warming of 0.22 K year−1 (mainly in Somalia and Kenya). The nighttime LST trends affected a large part of EA (31%) and were dominated by significant warming trend (0.06 K year−1). Influenced by contrasting daytime and nighttime LST trends, the diurnal LST range reduced in 15% of EA. The modeling result showed that latent heat flux (32%), incoming longwave radiation (30%), and shortwave radiation (23%) were stronger in explaining daytime LST trend. The effects of surface factors were stronger in both cooling and warming trends, whereas atmospheric factors had stronger control only on surface cooling trends. These results indicate the differential control of surface and atmospheric factors on warming and cooling trends, highlighting the importance of considering both factors for accurate evaluation of the LST trends in the future. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres | - |
dc.subject | land surface temperature | - |
dc.subject | MERRA-2 | - |
dc.subject | MODIS Aqua | - |
dc.subject | surface energy balance | - |
dc.subject | trend | - |
dc.title | Land Surface Temperature Trend and Its Drivers in East Africa | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1029/2020JD033446 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85097653664 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 125 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 23 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | article no. e2020JD033446 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | article no. e2020JD033446 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 2169-8996 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000599939900005 | - |