File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Ruxolitinib for Glucocorticoid-Refractory Acute Graft-versus-Host Disease

TitleRuxolitinib for Glucocorticoid-Refractory Acute Graft-versus-Host Disease
Authors
Issue Date2020
PublisherMassachusetts Medical Society. The Journal's web site is located at http://content.nejm.org/
Citation
New England Journal of Medicine, 2020, v. 382 n. 19, p. 1800-1810 How to Cite?
AbstractBACKGROUND: Acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) remains a major limitation of allogeneic stem-cell transplantation; not all patients have a response to standard glucocorticoid treatment. In a phase 2 trial, ruxolitinib, a selective Janus kinase (JAK1 and JAK2) inhibitor, showed potential efficacy in patients with glucocorticoid-refractory acute GVHD. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase 3 trial comparing the efficacy and safety of oral ruxolitinib (10 mg twice daily) with the investigator’s choice of therapy from a list of nine commonly used options (control) in patients 12 years of age or older who had glucocorticoid-refractory acute GVHD after allogeneic stem-cell transplantation. The primary end point was overall response (complete response or partial response) at day 28. The key secondary end point was durable overall response at day 56. RESULTS: A total of 309 patients underwent randomization; 154 patients were assigned to the ruxolitinib group and 155 to the control group. Overall response at day 28 was higher in the ruxolitinib group than in the control group (62% [96 patients] vs. 39% [61]; odds ratio, 2.64; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.65 to 4.22; P<0.001). Durable overall response at day 56 was higher in the ruxolitinib group than in the control group (40% [61 patients] vs. 22% [34]; odds ratio, 2.38; 95% CI, 1.43 to 3.94; P<0.001). The estimated cumulative incidence of loss of response at 6 months was 10% in the ruxolitinib group and 39% in the control group. The median failure-free survival was considerably longer with ruxolitinib than with control (5.0 months vs. 1.0 month; hazard ratio for relapse or progression of hematologic disease, non–relapse-related death, or addition of new systemic therapy for acute GVHD, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.35 to 0.60). The median overall survival was 11.1 months in the ruxolitinib group and 6.5 months in the control group (hazard ratio for death, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.60 to 1.15). The most common adverse events up to day 28 were thrombocytopenia (in 50 of 152 patients [33%] in the ruxolitinib group and 27 of 150 [18%] in the control group), anemia (in 46 [30%] and 42 [28%], respectively), and cytomegalovirus infection (in 39 [26%] and 31 [21%]). CONCLUSIONS: Ruxolitinib therapy led to significant improvements in efficacy outcomes, with a higher incidence of thrombocytopenia, the most frequent toxic effect, than that observed with control therapy. (Funded by Novartis; REACH2 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02913261. opens in new tab.)
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/308328
ISSN
2022 Impact Factor: 158.5
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 19.889
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorZeuser, R-
dc.contributor.authorvon Bubnoff, N-
dc.contributor.authorButler, J-
dc.contributor.authorMohty, M-
dc.contributor.authorNiederwieser, D-
dc.contributor.authorOr, R-
dc.contributor.authorSzer, J-
dc.contributor.authorWagner, EM-
dc.contributor.authorZuckerman, T-
dc.contributor.authorMahuzier, B-
dc.contributor.authorXu, J-
dc.contributor.authorWilke, C-
dc.contributor.authorGandhi, KK-
dc.contributor.authorSocie, G-
dc.contributor.authorThe REACH2 Trial Group-
dc.contributor.authorKwong, YL-
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-25T01:17:33Z-
dc.date.available2021-11-25T01:17:33Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.citationNew England Journal of Medicine, 2020, v. 382 n. 19, p. 1800-1810-
dc.identifier.issn0028-4793-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/308328-
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) remains a major limitation of allogeneic stem-cell transplantation; not all patients have a response to standard glucocorticoid treatment. In a phase 2 trial, ruxolitinib, a selective Janus kinase (JAK1 and JAK2) inhibitor, showed potential efficacy in patients with glucocorticoid-refractory acute GVHD. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase 3 trial comparing the efficacy and safety of oral ruxolitinib (10 mg twice daily) with the investigator’s choice of therapy from a list of nine commonly used options (control) in patients 12 years of age or older who had glucocorticoid-refractory acute GVHD after allogeneic stem-cell transplantation. The primary end point was overall response (complete response or partial response) at day 28. The key secondary end point was durable overall response at day 56. RESULTS: A total of 309 patients underwent randomization; 154 patients were assigned to the ruxolitinib group and 155 to the control group. Overall response at day 28 was higher in the ruxolitinib group than in the control group (62% [96 patients] vs. 39% [61]; odds ratio, 2.64; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.65 to 4.22; P<0.001). Durable overall response at day 56 was higher in the ruxolitinib group than in the control group (40% [61 patients] vs. 22% [34]; odds ratio, 2.38; 95% CI, 1.43 to 3.94; P<0.001). The estimated cumulative incidence of loss of response at 6 months was 10% in the ruxolitinib group and 39% in the control group. The median failure-free survival was considerably longer with ruxolitinib than with control (5.0 months vs. 1.0 month; hazard ratio for relapse or progression of hematologic disease, non–relapse-related death, or addition of new systemic therapy for acute GVHD, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.35 to 0.60). The median overall survival was 11.1 months in the ruxolitinib group and 6.5 months in the control group (hazard ratio for death, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.60 to 1.15). The most common adverse events up to day 28 were thrombocytopenia (in 50 of 152 patients [33%] in the ruxolitinib group and 27 of 150 [18%] in the control group), anemia (in 46 [30%] and 42 [28%], respectively), and cytomegalovirus infection (in 39 [26%] and 31 [21%]). CONCLUSIONS: Ruxolitinib therapy led to significant improvements in efficacy outcomes, with a higher incidence of thrombocytopenia, the most frequent toxic effect, than that observed with control therapy. (Funded by Novartis; REACH2 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02913261. opens in new tab.)-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherMassachusetts Medical Society. The Journal's web site is located at http://content.nejm.org/-
dc.relation.ispartofNew England Journal of Medicine-
dc.rightsFrom [New England Journal of Medicine, Author(s), Ruxolitinib for Glucocorticoid-Refractory Acute Graft-versus-Host Disease, Volume 382, Page 1800-1810 Copyright © (2020) Massachusetts Medical Society. Reprinted with permission.-
dc.titleRuxolitinib for Glucocorticoid-Refractory Acute Graft-versus-Host Disease-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailKwong, YL: ylkwong@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityKwong, YL=rp00358-
dc.description.naturepublished_or_final_version-
dc.identifier.doi10.1056/NEJMoa1917635-
dc.identifier.pmid32320566-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85084642915-
dc.identifier.hkuros317695-
dc.identifier.volume382-
dc.identifier.issue19-
dc.identifier.spage1800-
dc.identifier.epage1810-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000533411000011-
dc.publisher.placeUnited States-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats