File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Pressures on Chinese Judges under Xi

TitlePressures on Chinese Judges under Xi
Authors
Issue Date2021
PublisherUniversity of Chicago Press. The Journal's web site is located at https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/loi/tcj
Citation
The China Journal, 2021, v. 85, p. 49-74 How to Cite?
AbstractDrawing on interviews with Chinese judges, this paper reveals the major effects of judicial reforms during the past half decade. It focuses on the ramifications of a new quota and responsibility system for judges and on the strengthening of central-government controls over the judiciary. The paper differentiates between what the Party considers to be legitimate and illegitimate influences on judges, which sheds light on recent legal developments and the role of the judiciary in Chinese governance. The article finds that illegitimate influences on courts have declined palpably, but what the Party perceives to be legitimate influences have persisted and even been reinforced. More direct, comprehensive control over judges has replaced previously fragmented, multilayered mechanisms. Despite important changes, the reforms did not lead to institutional independence of Chinese judges, nor has the stature of the courts in China’s political landscape changed.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/307876
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 4.7
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.005
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHe, X-
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-12T13:39:11Z-
dc.date.available2021-11-12T13:39:11Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.citationThe China Journal, 2021, v. 85, p. 49-74-
dc.identifier.issn1324-9347-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/307876-
dc.description.abstractDrawing on interviews with Chinese judges, this paper reveals the major effects of judicial reforms during the past half decade. It focuses on the ramifications of a new quota and responsibility system for judges and on the strengthening of central-government controls over the judiciary. The paper differentiates between what the Party considers to be legitimate and illegitimate influences on judges, which sheds light on recent legal developments and the role of the judiciary in Chinese governance. The article finds that illegitimate influences on courts have declined palpably, but what the Party perceives to be legitimate influences have persisted and even been reinforced. More direct, comprehensive control over judges has replaced previously fragmented, multilayered mechanisms. Despite important changes, the reforms did not lead to institutional independence of Chinese judges, nor has the stature of the courts in China’s political landscape changed.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherUniversity of Chicago Press. The Journal's web site is located at https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/loi/tcj-
dc.relation.ispartofThe China Journal-
dc.rightsThe China Journal. Copyright © University of Chicago Press.-
dc.titlePressures on Chinese Judges under Xi-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailHe, X: xfhe@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityHe, X=rp02358-
dc.description.naturepublished_or_final_version-
dc.identifier.doi10.1086/711751-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85098083212-
dc.identifier.hkuros330147-
dc.identifier.volume85-
dc.identifier.spage49-
dc.identifier.epage74-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000600588600001-
dc.publisher.placeAustralia-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats