File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Appropriateness of standard cephalometric norms for the assessment of dentofacial characteristics in patients with cleidocranial dysplasia

TitleAppropriateness of standard cephalometric norms for the assessment of dentofacial characteristics in patients with cleidocranial dysplasia
Authors
KeywordsCephalometry
Craniofacial
Dental
Orthodontics
Syndrome
Issue Date2021
PublisherBritish Institute of Radiology. The Journal's web site is located at http://dmfr.birjournals.org/
Citation
Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, 2021 How to Cite?
AbstractObjectives: Cleidocranial dysplasia (CCD) is a rare skeletal syndrome affecting craniofacial and dental development. As a consequence, conventional cephalometric landmarks may not be valid for CCD patients, and the appropriateness of norms used for the general population should be critically discussed. Methods: Five patients 9- to 22-year-old (three females, two males) with CCD were included. Lateral-cephalograms, orthopantomographies, and intra-oral photos were retrospectively analysed. Lateral-cephalograms of 50 normal controls (ten for each CCD patient) matched for age and sex were selected from an online database. Cephalometric measurements of each CCD patients were compared with average values of matched controls using Wilcoxon signed-rank test for paired values (α = 0.05). Results: In CCD patients, a shortening of the cranial base was present (ΔSN = −17.1 mm, p = 0.043). Thus, the mandible (ΔSNPg = +9.5°, p = 0.043) and the maxilla (ΔSNA = +11.2°, p = 0.043) showed protrusion compared to the cranial base, despite a reduced maxillary (ΔCo-A = −15.1 mm, p = 0.043) and mandibular (ΔCo-Gn = −15.2 mm, p = 0.080) length. The mandibular divergence was reduced (ΔSN/GoGn = −6.4°, p = 0.043), a reduced overbite was present (ΔOverbite = −2.9 mm, p = 0.043), and the interincisal angle was increased (ΔInterincisalAngle = +13.7°, p = 0.043), mainly due to retro-inclination of lower incisors. Conclusions: Standard cephalometric norms for the assessment of horizontal jaw position may not be applicable to CCD patients because of a reduced anterior cranial base length compared to normal subjects. Vertical relationships may not be affected, and mandibular hypodivergency was confirmed.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/307837
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 2.9
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.816
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSavoldi, F-
dc.contributor.authorDel Re, F-
dc.contributor.authorTonni, I-
dc.contributor.authorGu, M-
dc.contributor.authorDalessandri, D-
dc.contributor.authorVisconti, L-
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-12T13:38:37Z-
dc.date.available2021-11-12T13:38:37Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.citationDentomaxillofacial Radiology, 2021-
dc.identifier.issn0250-832X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/307837-
dc.description.abstractObjectives: Cleidocranial dysplasia (CCD) is a rare skeletal syndrome affecting craniofacial and dental development. As a consequence, conventional cephalometric landmarks may not be valid for CCD patients, and the appropriateness of norms used for the general population should be critically discussed. Methods: Five patients 9- to 22-year-old (three females, two males) with CCD were included. Lateral-cephalograms, orthopantomographies, and intra-oral photos were retrospectively analysed. Lateral-cephalograms of 50 normal controls (ten for each CCD patient) matched for age and sex were selected from an online database. Cephalometric measurements of each CCD patients were compared with average values of matched controls using Wilcoxon signed-rank test for paired values (α = 0.05). Results: In CCD patients, a shortening of the cranial base was present (ΔSN = −17.1 mm, p = 0.043). Thus, the mandible (ΔSNPg = +9.5°, p = 0.043) and the maxilla (ΔSNA = +11.2°, p = 0.043) showed protrusion compared to the cranial base, despite a reduced maxillary (ΔCo-A = −15.1 mm, p = 0.043) and mandibular (ΔCo-Gn = −15.2 mm, p = 0.080) length. The mandibular divergence was reduced (ΔSN/GoGn = −6.4°, p = 0.043), a reduced overbite was present (ΔOverbite = −2.9 mm, p = 0.043), and the interincisal angle was increased (ΔInterincisalAngle = +13.7°, p = 0.043), mainly due to retro-inclination of lower incisors. Conclusions: Standard cephalometric norms for the assessment of horizontal jaw position may not be applicable to CCD patients because of a reduced anterior cranial base length compared to normal subjects. Vertical relationships may not be affected, and mandibular hypodivergency was confirmed.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherBritish Institute of Radiology. The Journal's web site is located at http://dmfr.birjournals.org/-
dc.relation.ispartofDentomaxillofacial Radiology-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectCephalometry-
dc.subjectCraniofacial-
dc.subjectDental-
dc.subjectOrthodontics-
dc.subjectSyndrome-
dc.titleAppropriateness of standard cephalometric norms for the assessment of dentofacial characteristics in patients with cleidocranial dysplasia-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailSavoldi, F: fsavoldi@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailGu, M: drgumin@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authoritySavoldi, F=rp02902-
dc.identifier.authorityGu, M=rp01892-
dc.description.naturepublished_or_final_version-
dc.identifier.doi10.1259/dmfr.20210015-
dc.identifier.pmid34739351-
dc.identifier.hkuros330354-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000759651200007-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdom-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats